kocak Posted September 17, 2002 Posted September 17, 2002 I was under the impression that for a small plan filer to be exempt from an audit (PYB after 4/17/01) they had to meet the qualifying plan assets/bonding requirement AND the disclosure requirement. However, reading Janice Wegesin's article in the ASPA Journal (May-Jun 2002) I get the impression they have to meet the qualifying plan assets OR bonding. If they meet the requirement by bonding, then disclosure on the SAR is needed. I thought disclosure on the SAR was needed in any case, unless and exception (like all assets are participant-directed accounts) applies. I'm looking at the DOL Reg and I'm not getting it. What am I missing? michele
Belgarath Posted September 18, 2002 Posted September 18, 2002 Agree that they must either meet the qualifying asset requirement, or increase their bonding as required. The SAR disclosure applies in either case.
austin3515 Posted September 19, 2002 Posted September 19, 2002 That's my impression as well, and I have ocnfirmed that with the DOL. I actually read the article you're talking about and had the same question! Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now