Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Under the presumptive method of computing a withdrawing employer's share of the unfunded vested benefits of a multi-employer plan, there are three parts that must be allocated: the pre-1980 piece, the post -1980 piece, and the reallocated piece.

Why does the law specify separate treatment for the reallocated piece?

It seems that the employer's share of the total unfunded remains the same whether the post-1980 piece and the reallocated piece are designated separately or or combined together

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use