mal Posted May 6, 2003 Posted May 6, 2003 By October our plans will be required under the EDI regulations to receive contributions and remittance information electronically. A question that has recently arisen concerns the interplay of the collective bargaining agreement with the EDI regs. Suppose the CBA says an employer must send all contributions and reports in paper form to the custodian. Must the plan still have the ability to receive this information electronically? If the employer asks to send the information electronically (in violation of the CBA) is the plan's only recourse a grievance or 301 action? Can an employer violate the CBA and still exercise its rights under the EDI regs?? Any thoughts are appreciated.
GBurns Posted May 8, 2003 Posted May 8, 2003 First beat senseless the person who drafted that CBA. Such rigidity was unnecessary and shortsighted. I think that adhering to the EDI requirements would violate the CBA, Why not get a MOU from the Union accepting this minor change in delivery? A violation of EDI has no bearing on the CBA and vice versa. What sort of 301 action do you see as possible? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
mal Posted May 15, 2003 Author Posted May 15, 2003 So would it be your opinion that the HW plan would be forced to accept the remittance report and the contributions electronically (even though the remainder of the monies and report would be sent in hard copy to the custodian)? The 301 action would be injunctive in nature asking the court to force the employer to follow its obligations under the CBA regardless of HIPAA. I do agree that the rights under HIPAA and the obligations under the CBA seem to be mutually exclusive of one another.
GBurns Posted May 15, 2003 Posted May 15, 2003 I wish that you had posted this on the Health Plans Forum where you might have received more responses. Why does this even apply to your company? What says that you have to receive contributions etc electronically? This sort of enrollment/participation information between employer, plan sponsor and service providers seems to be exempted. George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
mal Posted May 15, 2003 Author Posted May 15, 2003 I didn't put it there because I was seeking the opinion of those who work with or are familiar with collective bargaining agreements. My understanding is that it would apply to our group under the EDI regs. Two of the covered transactions are "benefit enrollment and maintenance" and "health plan premium payment." Hopefully I am just missing the boat and we can continue with business as usual.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now