Guest JerseyGirl Posted June 12, 2003 Posted June 12, 2003 Ok, experts, I need either an opinion, or to be pointed in the direction of official guidence. We are a TPA about to do a mid-year take over of a 125 plan that had been administered up until now in-house. The person doing the admin. was not as knowledgable as she could have been, and has now been fired. It is a calendar year plan, and we will begin on 7/1. My question is this: Can we have an open enrollment meeting to allow any qualifying employees who had not signed up before ( perhaps because it was not explained to them very well) to have the opportunity to do so now? We are not intending to allow any current participants to *opt-out* due to the administrative change or make any changes of election. Thanks much!
KIP KRAUS Posted June 12, 2003 Posted June 12, 2003 If you are merely taking over the administration of an existing 125 plan I don’t see how an open enrollment would be proper. A change in administration doesn’t change the status of the plan or the participants.
Guest llerner Posted June 12, 2003 Posted June 12, 2003 How about if you terminate your old plan and start a new one with a slight modification, let's say dollar amount. It is a takeover plan, tighten up the language to be sure HIPAA/COBRA etc. provisionsi included.
Lisa Hand Posted June 13, 2003 Posted June 13, 2003 I would not recommend the above suggestion to change the plan for a number of reasons. I entirely agree with Kip, you are taking over the administration, only. You should have an informational session to explain your services, not open enrollment. As a TPA, you should also have a legal guide which assists with these issues, since the advise and answers here are not in any way legal guidance.
Guest JerseyGirl Posted June 13, 2003 Posted June 13, 2003 I have to agree with you , Lisa. The desire was to boost participation, but we could not come up with a legitimate reason to justify a second enrollment-- no matter how hard we tried. The responses here have confirmed that our decision is the right one; had the feed-back from the message board been more of a mixed bag, I would have gone to our in-house counselor for an official legal opinion. Hardly seems necessary at this point-- those who did not choose to participate will just have to wait 'til next year. Thanks, JerseyGirl
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now