mming Posted September 22, 2004 Posted September 22, 2004 The owner and sole participant/employee of a profit sharing plan that has been filing 5500-EZs every year recently got divorced and now his ex-wife is an alternate payee with a segregated account balance in the plan. A colleague tells me that the plan can still file an EZ. I'm thinking that since the alternate payee is afforded the status of a beneficiary (e.g., getting copies of SPDs, SARs, a certificate showing her balance) a 5500 should be filed until the year after she is paid out. Who is correct?
bzorc Posted September 24, 2004 Posted September 24, 2004 I had a divorce situation (but no QDRO) where both ex-spouses left their account balances in the plan, and filed the 5500 instead of the 5500-EZ. Went with the "better safe than sorry" method.
Belgarath Posted September 24, 2004 Posted September 24, 2004 I don't have any definitive answer - not sure there even is one. But, like bzorc, I'd take a conservative position. The instructions for the 5500 EZ state the plan cannot "... provide benefits for anyone except..." While you could maybe argue that amounts segregated under a QDRO do not constitute "providing benefits" under the plan, I'd be very reluctant to hang my hat on that without some clear guidance. Granted that this result seems a little foolish to me, I'm still inclined to err on the side of caution - it isn't really that big a deal to prepare the 5500 as opposed to the EZ in this situation. Just another of those minor PIA's which enrich our lives!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now