Guest calcu Posted September 24, 2004 Posted September 24, 2004 One Trustee's company of a Taft-Hartley Plan is delinquent to the fund to the tune of millions. This has been going on for several years and was just brought to the attention of the other trustees. The company may now be going bankrupt. The trustee is the sole owner. May we go after the trustee personally under the theory that he breached his fiduciary duty to the fund by not disclosing the delinquency? even if the company files bankruptcy? Any other ideas will be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
david rigby Posted September 24, 2004 Posted September 24, 2004 Ouch! Get thee to competent ERISA attorney. Quickly. Make sure attorney has experience with Taft-Hartley plans and bankruptcy. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
GBurns Posted September 25, 2004 Posted September 25, 2004 Make sure the lawyer checks the D&O or Fiduciary Liability coverage of all the Trustees and the E&O etc of the Auditors and accountants etc. A number of years and they are just finding out? What happened to the Plan auditors and accountants etc? Didn't the Plan have to file Form 5500 and do tax returns, it should have showed up? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Effen Posted September 27, 2004 Posted September 27, 2004 I agree with both PAX & GBurns. I find this very hard to believe. Usually they Union stops sending men if an ER is more than a month or two behind. What do they expect to tell the men who worked for this guy when they ask for their pension benefits? I find it hard to believe that the Union let this get so far out of hand, without some sort of collusion between the other Trustees or the Plan Administrator. If what you say is true, they most likely have BIG problems. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Bill Ecklund Posted September 28, 2004 Posted September 28, 2004 The standards for deliquency collections is set forth in PTE 76-1. It would appear that the trustees have engaged in a prohibited transaction, which may make them personally liable for the delinquencies. If the pension plan is a db plan, then the law requires that they accrue benefits even though contributions have not been made.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now