PhilB Posted March 1, 2005 Posted March 1, 2005 My company sponsors a cafeteria plan that covers several subsidiary companies and employee groups under one medical plan design. We are considering offering domestic partner benefits to same sex couples, but are thinking of rolling it out first to only one of the business units (a subsidiary) as a "test case.” Are there any discrimination issues we could conflict with in offering DP benefits to one subsidiary business unit vs. another when both are covered under the same cafeteria plan?
jsb Posted March 1, 2005 Posted March 1, 2005 DP benefits cannot be offered under a "cafeteria" plan. Income must be imputed (federal taxes, state taxes may or may not apply) for the value of the employer-paid portion of the benefits and any employee-paid amount must be taken post-tax (again, state tax laws may vary).
PhilB Posted March 1, 2005 Author Posted March 1, 2005 Yes, we will apply the imputed income to the employee's earnings. But can we offer the coverage to only one segment of the employee population without discriminating against the other? I am aware of no such rule that would prevent us from doing this at this time but want to double check.
jstorch Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Is the subsidiary's employee demographic representative of the company as a whole? If the subsidiary had a disproportionately higher concentration of highly compensated employees, discrimination could be an issue.
PhilB Posted March 3, 2005 Author Posted March 3, 2005 No, it is representative and made up of administrative exempt, non-exempt and factory employees.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now