Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Assuming the other conditions of the safe harbor are met, I'm looking for guidance on the "make or influence investment decisions" and "compensation" elements, where the employer is a bank that wants to offer its HSA custodial package to its own employees. Employer would waive its usual transaction and account-maintenance fees, but would receive some indirect income from the accounts (i.e., interchange revenue from debit card use, sweep fees from the program's money market account, and 12b-1 fees from non-proprietary mutual funds and investment management fees from proprietary mutual funds. There is simply no way to "turn off" some of these indirect revenue streams; does that mean that any HSA program the bank offers its employees is unavoidably an ERISA plan?

I've seen a little informal chit-chat advising banks to offer HSAs to their own employees only on the same terms they would give a third party--I'm not sure I understand that. In this case, that would mean keeping the "consideration" the bank is willing to forego, which seems like a direct contravention of the FAB.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use