Guest CharlieLaur Posted July 6, 2006 Posted July 6, 2006 Looking for some feedback on how you handle this question: Item # 7h: Number of participants that terminated employment during the plan year with accrued benefits that were less than 100% vested. Do you include participants in this item solely on the basis of whether they are less than 100% vested or do you also take into account whether they actually have a non-zero accrued benefit (account balance)? Example # 1: Participant in profit sharing plan is 0% vested but has a zero account balance due to the fact that he entered the plan but never received an allocation of employer contribution or forfeitures. Should he be included in item # 7h? Example # 2: Participant in 401(k) Plan has account balance attributable to salary deferrals (100% vested) but has no account balance attributable to employer contributions/forfeitures (20% vested). Should he be included in item # 7h? Thanks for your thoughts!
WDIK Posted July 6, 2006 Posted July 6, 2006 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=31387 ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now