Just Me Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 Does anyone see a problem with a nonqualified plan subject to 409A providing that if the participant's account balance is less than some fixed amount (say, $25,000) at the distribution date, then it's a lump sum, but if it's at or above that amount, it will be paid in accordance with the participant's (timely made) form and timing election, such as a 10 year installment payment? [This is not intended to fit within the discretionary de minimis rule.]
XTitan Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 Personally, I don't, but Treasury seems to. For now, it's ok. See Notice 2007-78 on limited cashouts. - There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data sets...
Just Me Posted October 29, 2008 Author Posted October 29, 2008 Thanks. Somehow, I knew we could do this, but wasn't sure where the guidance was (clearly not in the final regulations).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now