HCWilliams Posted October 21, 2009 Posted October 21, 2009 Our doctor client owns a medical research clinic which is an LLC in which he is sole owner which I guess is treated the same as a sole proprietor. He has now joined a medical group (corporation w/5 Drs. and 20 EEs) in which he is a 20% shareholder. The research clinic and medical group are 2 separate businesses and have very limited common business dealings or patients (certainly less than 5%). I have concerns about 2 issues. First, is the issue of "regularly performing services for the FSO or regularly be associated with the FSO in performing services for 3rd parties." It would seem that this is not the case since our client says there is very little common business or patients. Second, I want to confirm that the Doctor's personal services for the corporation as an employee are separate and distinct from his LLC or sole proprietorship such that the LLC is not considered to be performing the services for the corporation. Since the LLC has 5 employees who are not associated with the medical group in any way, I think there is a clear business distinction, but want to be sure. I think it would be better if the research clinic were incorporated, but that is not the case. What do you think? Thanks, HW
K2retire Posted October 23, 2009 Posted October 23, 2009 What do their ERISA attorney and/or CPA think?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now