Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think I printed a copy of the Senate version before Obama signed it. Towards the end, there was a section titled Section 315 Transition Rule for Certifications of Plan Status. Section (b)(2) of this section said if you wanted to change a past certification as a result of the new law you had to do so within 75 days after the enactment of the Act.

I printed the CCH version after it was signed, which was labeled Senate version as approved by the House and signed by the President; however, this section seems to be gone.

Did they delete the 75 day requirement before it was signed?

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Guest Matthew Gouaux
Posted

You're looking at Section 315 of the May version of HR 4213, the Tax Extenders bill. The multiemployer provisions of the funding relief bill signed by the President (HR 3962) was taken from a prior version of the Tax Extenders bill that was passed by the Senate in March, and not the more recent version of the same bill passed in the House in May, which includes Section 315. My understanding is that for some reason Congress scrapped several months of work that went into improving the multiemployer funding relief provisions of the Tax Extenders bill. Here's a link to the bill the President signed into law as Public Law No. 111-192: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/ge...3962enr.txt.pdf.

Posted

Thank you. So I guess that means we have absolutely no guidance on how to handle a potential status change as a result of the new law? This is just insanity!

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted
... we have absolutely no guidance ... This is just insanity!

Surprise!

:D

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use