Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an employee who deferred and vested $50 prior to 2005. Since 2005 he has deferred and vested thousands. We had a slight operational failure that needs to be corrected under Notice 2008-113. I'd like to treat the $50 as subject to 409A so that we can make one correction under Notice 2008-113, instead of two (one for the thousands deferred after 2005 and one for just $50).

Is it ok to treat grandfathered nonqualified deferred compensation as subject to 409A?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use