Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We have a client that has two participants who had distributions paid in 2009 with incorrect vesting calculations.

The correct vesting was calculated and paid to these participants in 2010.

The client wants to know if they now need to answer question 4L on the Schedule H ‘Has the plan failed to provide any benefit when due under the plan’ as a ‘Yes.’

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Posted

I would be very surprised if that is the sort of situation intended to be addressed by that question. I always thought of that question as involving cash flow problems.

By the way, not paying a lump sum because of funding issues (whether attributable to Section 436 or high-25 issues) is NOT a failure to pay plan benefits when due. As the plan incorporates the requirements of Section 436 and the high-25 restriction, a restricted payment is not due under the terms of the plan.

Always check with your actuary first!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use