Guest MJ1 Posted February 25, 2011 Posted February 25, 2011 Can a change in control definition be more restrictive (with respect to factors other than the change in ownership/effective control percentage threshold) than under the regulations? For example, can a plan sponsored by a closely-held corporation require that a change in control be made to non-family members in order to qualify as a change in control? I believe that this is permissible, and the 318 attribution applies so the rules would, in most cases, require such a change in order to qualify as a CIC.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now