Guest ip0905 Posted May 19, 2011 Posted May 19, 2011 I believe I am over complicating this, but I need assistance on how other cafeteria plans calculate imputed income for the children of domestic partners. Example - Employee is covering his/her "152" qualified children on the plan today and adds their domestic partner and domestic partner children. I can easily figure out the pre and post tax cost of adding the domestic partner and the imputed income for the domestic partner. I am having trouble trying to figure out the pre and post tax cost along with the imputed income for the domestic partners children. This is the first time our plan is offering this and any assistance or examples would help. Thank you.
SLuskin Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 If the policy cost is the same for 1 child or 12 children, we haven't been adding any imputed income for the domestic partner children. However, if there is 1 charge for EE + 1 child and a different charge for EE + 2 or more children, we have been imputing the cost of that first child to the domestic partner.
GMK Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 Sorry to muddy the water, but our understanding is that each covered person who does not qualify as a tax dependent is counted for imputed income. That is, for example, if the employee already has family coverage and adds coverage for a non-tax dependent, we have to compute imputed income for that non-tax dependent's coverage, even though the premium does not increase.
QDROphile Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 I think GMK's position is more tenable. The "no marginal cost" approach is aggressive.
MARYMM Posted June 10, 2011 Posted June 10, 2011 Sorry to muddy the water, but our understanding is that each covered person who does not qualify as a tax dependent is counted for imputed income. That is, for example, if the employee already has family coverage and adds coverage for a non-tax dependent, we have to compute imputed income for that non-tax dependent's coverage, even though the premium does not increase. We were advised by counsel to do it this way. We use the single premium cost as the Fair Market value for each non-tax dependent covered. Using the COBRA cost was another option given to us.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now