Guest Alexpi Posted April 5, 2012 Posted April 5, 2012 Company A owns 49% of Company B. Both are C corps. Company A currently has a 401(k) plan for employees. Company B is looking to start a 401(k) plan for it's two employees. Would this be considered a controlled or affiliated group? Company B is a engineering service company that provides exclusive work for Company A. Company A's primary business is software but also provides services to Company B (legal, accounting, IT, HR, etc..) Is there any way this would be considered a controlled or affiliated group? Thank you!
ETA Consulting LLC Posted April 6, 2012 Posted April 6, 2012 It looks like an Affiliated Service Group (at the very least, under the B-Org rules). Could be a Controlled Group depending on who owns the other 51% and the attribution rules applied to that ownership. Good Luck! CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
Guest Alexpi Posted April 6, 2012 Posted April 6, 2012 It looks like an Affiliated Service Group (at the very least, under the B-Org rules). Could be a Controlled Group depending on who owns the other 51% and the attribution rules applied to that ownership.Good Luck! Thanks for the input! The other 51% is owned by an employee of Company B (35%) and an ex-employee of Company B (16%). I'm guessing that makes us a controlled group?
ETA Consulting LLC Posted April 7, 2012 Posted April 7, 2012 Thanks for the input! The other 51% is owned by an employee of Company B (35%) and an ex-employee of Company B (16%). I'm guessing that makes us a controlled group? Not necessarily. Suppose the employee owning 35% and the ex-employee owning 16% both have rights of first refusal requiring them to sell their shares to Company A before attempting to sell them to someone else. This would create an attribution of that 51% to Company A; making them now own 100% (a Parent - Subsidiary Controlled Group). You'd never know until asking a "potentially" exhaustive series of questions designed to determine if attribution of shares exist. This is merely one of many questions. Hope this helps. CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
Guest Alexpi Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 Thanks for the input! The other 51% is owned by an employee of Company B (35%) and an ex-employee of Company B (16%). I'm guessing that makes us a controlled group? Not necessarily. Suppose the employee owning 35% and the ex-employee owning 16% both have rights of first refusal requiring them to sell their shares to Company A before attempting to sell them to someone else. This would create an attribution of that 51% to Company A; making them now own 100% (a Parent - Subsidiary Controlled Group). You'd never know until asking a "potentially" exhaustive series of questions designed to determine if attribution of shares exist. This is merely one of many questions. Hope this helps. I see...That makes sense. The 51% shareholders have to sell their shares back to Company B at the end of two years and Company A is under contract to purchase those shares from Company B (same date 2 years from now) to make the ownership 100%...There is a reason that Company A will not purchase the shares directly from Company B shareholders but I don't think the details of that will matter here. I knew that when the 100% purchase takes place we would be a controlled group but I was looking to see if we were not considered a control group until that date. Thanks for all your help!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now