jjaatirs Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 We have a client who terminated their plan effective 10/31/2014. As of 12/31/2014, there were some participants who were still active employees of the employer who had not yet cashed out of the plan. Should they be counted as Active or as Separated participants for purposes of lines 6a(2) and 6b of the 5500? The instructions say that Active Participants are "any individuals who are currently in employment covered by the plan and who are earning or retaining credited service under the plan." I can see the argument that these people should be counted as Separated since they are not currently in employment "covered by the plan" and they are not earning credited service under the plan. However, I can also see the argument that they should be counted as Active since they are currently employed by the plan sponsor and the are retaining credited service under the plan. I'm guessing that I'm missing something basic and obvious, but this one confused me today. Thanks in advance for any input.
Lou S. Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 I could see an argument for either but I'd treat them as "active" since they are still employed by the Plan Sponsor at EOY.
My 2 cents Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 My vote is for counting them as active. Surely, standard practice in an ongoing but frozen plan is to count those still employed as actives for 5500 purposes, isn't it? Always check with your actuary first!
jjaatirs Posted August 27, 2015 Author Posted August 27, 2015 Thanks, Lou & 2, I was leaning toward active so I'll go with that.
david rigby Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Pardon my bluntness, but this is silly. In the context of the 5500, the various categories are pretty simple: "active" means "actively employed", and "separated" means "not actively employed". Please don't seek complexity when it's not needed. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now