Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think I have the correct answer to this, but getting it wrong would be costly, so I'd appreciate other opinions.

Is a cycle E restatement and submission for the following plan timely if complete by 1/31/16 (cycle E)?

For EGTRRA, Plan X was Cycle E plan based on employer EIN. Plan X applied for and received Cycle E letter for EGTRRA.

MERGER #1

In 2012, sponsor merged into another organization with EIN ending in "4". So post-change, applicable cycle is D. (Not sure of the merger date within 2012, but this shouldn't matter because neither D nor E was open or expired at any time in 2012).

MERGER #2

1/1/15, sponsor merged into another organization with EIN ending in "0".

Pre-change cycle is D

Post-change cycle is E

Unless one of the exceptions in section 11.03 of Rev. Proc. 2007-44 applies, then the post-change cycle (E) will be the applicable cycle.

Consideration of 11.03 exceptions...

(1) N/A Post-change cycle is not open

(2) N/A Post-change cycle has not expired

(3) Post-change cycle (E) ends later than the pre-change cycle (D) and and pre-change cycle (D) is open (yes), the plan is permitted to treat the pre-change cycle as the applicable cycle. This sounds optional to me - meaning there is also an option to use the post-change cycle.

(4) N/A pre-change cycle is not expired

(5) N/A one of the cycles is currently open

I think the plan is now cycle E plan again and will be in compliance if restated by 1/31/16 in accordance with the 2014 cumulative list. We intend to file for a letter. The plan could have elected to use Cycle D, but wasn't required to.

Anyone disagree?

Input appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...