Guest GARNETT Posted April 1, 2000 Posted April 1, 2000 A client sponsors a medical insurance plan for its employees. The employees pay for a portion of the medical insurance with pre-tax contributions. For example, Example 1. Compensation $3,000.00 per month Medical Insur. 200.00 Net Compensation $2,800.00 FICA 173.60 Medicare Tax 40.60 Federal Withholding 560.00 State Withholding 140.00 Local Withholding 52.50 Total Tax and W/H 966.70 Net Compensation $1,833.30 Take Home Pay $1,833.30 The client has been approached by a consulting firm that claims that the company can shift more of the cost for the medical insurance to the employees by asking the employees to use more of their pre-tax dollars to purchase the insurance while, at the same time, reimbursing the employees (tax-free) for the increase. This is the example the consulting firm uses: Example 2. Compensation $3,000.00 per month Medical Insur. 500.00 Net Compensation $2,500.00 FICA 155.00 Medicare Tax 36.25 Federal Withholding 500.00 State Withholding 125.00 Local Withholding 52.50 Total Tax and W/H 868.75 Net Compensation $1,631.25 Reimbursement 202.05 (tax-free) Take Home Pay $1,833.30 The employee takes home the same income in Example 1 as she does in Example 2. The consulting firm "pitching" this "scheme" further claims that the employer, incurs the following savings: Example 3. FICA/Medicare $45.90 Workers Compensation 3.00 Federal Tax 60.00 State Tax 15.00 Total Savings $123.90/month Annualized Savings/Employee $1,486.80 Annualized Savings for 100 employees is $148,679.74 (i.e., $1,486.80 times 100). While this scheme appears to me to be a double-dip not generally authorized by the tax-code, i.e., the first dip is the pre-tax contribution made by the employee and the second dip is the reimbursement of a portion of that pre-tax contribution by the employer (again tax-free), the consulting firm claims that it has set-up this program for a wide-range of clients including a Fortune 500 company. I have two questions: (1) Has anyone every heard of a program like this and (2) Does anyone else question whether such a scheme is permissible under the tax code? Thank you for your responses.
Guest jlcowden Posted April 13, 2000 Posted April 13, 2000 See response under voluntary benefits posted today 4/13/00. ------------------ jlcowden
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now