cbassociate2017 Posted February 20, 2018 Posted February 20, 2018 Hello, If a MEWA plan is level funded, can it possibly be considered fully-insured? And if it has not existed for a year, does that give us any out from being considered a MEWA? Seller is part of a MEWA and hasn't been in compliance with state insurance laws.
leevena Posted February 21, 2018 Posted February 21, 2018 Wow, you have many issues here. Let’s start with the insured/self-funded issue first. What does the plan documents say about this? Level funded is a relatively new term, and some people use it loosely, when I started in 1982 we called them retrospective arrangements. But I would assume it is self-insured. As for MEWA, there is no requirement that I know of that requires contracts to be insured, now your state may be different, but I doubt it. So following that logic, and assuming it is self-insured, there is no need to follow state regulations because ERISA governs. If you are trying to exit the contract early keep in mind the self-insured contract will more than likely expose you/employer to the claims costs. Lastly, I would double check the program structure and verify that it is in fact a MEWA. A recent innovation has been the use of a captive to fund benefits. These captives have multiple employers participating. Good luck, and I am available to discuss on phone if you would like. cbassociate2017 1
David C Smith Posted February 21, 2018 Posted February 21, 2018 Definitely would say that it is not an insured plan, but it is (like other level-funded plans) a funded self-funded plan...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now