Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Ralph Amadio
Posted

A California city client's city attorney has asked the following:

Will the City's financial capability be impaired in any way in the event that "leased employees" who lack sovereign immunity are utilized in job functions ranging from jail guards to parks and recreation employees?

His concern lies in the possibility of a California deep pockets suit in which the City is found liable over the amount of insurance carried by leasing contractor. How would revenue and/or bond counsel view this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use