Dalai Pookah Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 DB plan established in 2017. Employee worked for employer 2007-2015. Employee rehired 9/1/18. Therefore, enters plan 9/1/18. Since employee won't have 1000 hours in 2018, is that employee treated as benefiting under the plan? If not, then is an 11(g) amendment required to bring in employee to meet 410(b) [currently, 4 HCE-1 excluded, and two NHCE-counting the rehire)? Here, 410(b) would be 50%/75%=67%. I don't see any relief from Reg. §410(b)-3. I don't think that an 11(g) amendment could be made to merely apply the 1-year holdout rule, which would make the rehire wait until one Year of Service has been met (which, then avoids the dilemma. Am I missing something here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuseFan Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 Employee is/is not benefiting based on plan terms - if 1000 hours is required for an accrual, then not benefiting. Even with the holdout rule (which you can't 11g in) at 9/1/19 they come in retro to 9/1/18 and you still have a 2018 issue. So this RH is not a statutory exclusion and so your NHCE coverage is 50%. You say there are 4 HCEs with 1 excluded - but is that a statutory exclusion, a plan exclusion or otherwise just not benefiting? Because if statutory exclusion (including term <500 hours not benefiting) then your HCE coverage is 100%, not 75%. If your coverage is 67% then you can see if plan passes coverage using average benefits, possibly aggregate with a DC plan if plausible, or 11g an accrual to the rehire. Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C. B. Zeller Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 May not be eligible to use average benefits test - if the excluded HCE is excluded by name it would not be a reasonable classification. Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now