RatherBeGolfing Posted April 10, 2020 Posted April 10, 2020 @EBECatty Agreed. It has also been very helpful when looking at the loan provisions. 1 hour ago, EBECatty said: To the extent the same rules govern 402(f) notices and direct rollovers, if you default to no 20% withholding for plans not offering CRDs, would you also default to no 402(f) notices and no direct rollovers? There is also a bit of a conflict between plan and individual treatment of distributions. The plan can treat a distribution to a qualified individual as a CRD, unless the aggregate distributions from all plans maintained by the employer (and any member of any controlled group which includes the employer) to such individual exceeds $100,000. The Individual on the other hand, can designate any distribution as a CRD as long as the total amount does not exceed $100,000. So if I take $50,000 from my IRA (and intend to designate is as a CRD) and $100,000 from my 401(k), I can only designate $50,000 from the plan as a CRD. The plan can treat the entire $100,000 as a CRD. Should the plan's default be to treat any distribution to a qualified individual as a CRD as long as it does not exceed $100,000, or should the plan leave it up to the participant to tell the plan if less than 100% of the distribution should be treated as a CRD, and treat the remainder as normal distribution?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now