card Posted November 29, 2000 Posted November 29, 2000 Company A acquires Company B. A maintains Plan X and B maintains Plan Y, both 401(k) plans. Company A would like to merge Plan Y into Plan X. However, Plan Y never received a determination letter, and Company A is cautious. So Company A decides to allow Company B employees to participate in Plan A, and further decides to freeze Plan Y pending it's decision as to whether or not to seek a determination letter for Plan Y, and whether or not to merge the plans. While this is pending, Company B dismisses a large number of employees. The number of employees released would be significant with respect to Plan B but not Plan A. The questions are: 1. Must Plan B participants be vested because there has been a discontinuance of contributions to Plan B? 2. If the answer to (1) is no (because either there is an intent to merge the plans, or because the pre-ERISA concept of substituting a comparable plan applies), then does the dismissal of employees require a partial termination analysis? With respect to which plan? 3. Should I change professions? thanks- rob
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now