BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo
Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Featured Jobs

Client Services Representative (Miami FL / Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Administrator (Santa Ana CA)

Sales - 401(k) / DB (FL / GA / IL / MN / MO / NC / TN / WI)
Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn

News Items, by Subject

Church-sponsored plans

View Headlines Now Viewing Excerpts and

SSM Health Care Reaches $60 Million Settlement in Church Plan Case
"Participants in several SSM Health pension plans in Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wisconsin claimed in a lawsuit originally filed in 2016 ... that SSM Health did not meet statutory requirements to qualify as a church plan exempt from [ERISA].... The settlement requires SSM Health to fully fund the plan for 10 years, contribute $15 million per year to the plan from 2019 to 2022 and make additional payments to workers who received their retirement savings in a lump sum." (Pensions & Investments)
$60M Settlement Reached in SSM Health Care Corp. Litigation Over 'Church Plan' Status
"The settlement requires SSM Health Care Corp. to fully fund its employee retirement plan for 10 years, deposit $15 million per year in the plan from 2019 to 2022, and make $115 payments to workers who received their retirement savings in a lump sum. The plan's funding status was a point of contention during the case's three years in court, with SSM Health workers saying the plan was underfunded by roughly $813 million due to its official classification as a church-affiliated plan[.]" (Cohen Milstein)
New Tactics Being Deployed to Challenge Church Plans
"The key issues being argued now center around the degree of connection between a pension plan and the religious organization, including how the pension plan is maintained or controlled, and the sponsor's principal purpose.... Other plaintiffs are pursuing different arguments at the state court level.... Another legal question that could come up more often involves churches related to plan sponsors seeking bankruptcy protection." (Pensions & Investments)
New Jersey Hospital Pensioners Sue Newark Archdiocese
"The retirees' complaint alleges that their pensions were payable for life and fully protected by federal law and the federal pension insurance program until 1990 when the Archdiocese obtained an IRS ruling that the Saint James Hospital pension plan was a 'church plan' ... Unlike many other lawsuits that have been brought by retirees in 'church plans,' this case is being brought under state, rather than federal, law." (Pension Rights Center)
$60M Deal Gets Green Light in SSM Health 'Church Plan' Suit
"If approved, the settlement would require SSM Health to commit to fully funding its retirement plan for 10 years. The deal would also force SSM Health to pay $15 million to the plan each year from 2019 to 2022, bringing the hospital system's total settlement-imposed plan contributions to $60 million." (Cohen Milstein)
Whither the American Pension?
"The sudden erosion of pension benefits for 1,100 former employees of the old St. Clare's Hospital in Schenectady is a scenario that isn't supposed to happen.... [ERISA] contained a religious exemption that was later expanded to hospitals operated by religious groups, and St. Clare's took advantage of that.... But what about the rest of America? Two generations of American workers increasingly don't have to worry about pension plan failures because fewer and fewer workplaces offer pensions." (The Daily Gazette)
Judge Conditionally Approves Proposed Settlement to Resolve St. Joseph Health Lawsuits
"Provisions in the proposed settlement include an immediate lump-sum payment of at least $11.15 million and admission by the settling defendants that the plaintiffs' damages are at least $125 million. This proposed settlement could resolve lawsuits filed in June alleging that St. Joseph's Health Services stopped making necessary contributions to the retirement plan, resulting in it being grossly underfunded." (Pensions & Investments)
Dignity Health 'Church Plan' Litigation Defeats Dismissal Motions
"The case already made it once to the Supreme Court ... The District Court [now has ruled] that the plaintiffs plausibly allege that Dignity is not associated with a church. The successful arguments are based on the fact that Dignity does not impose any denominational requirement on its employees; has a practice of affiliating with hospitals that claim no religious affiliation; provides non-denominational chapels; and does not impose any denominational requirement on its patients." [Rollins v. Dignity Health, No. 13-1450 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2018)] (PLANSPONSOR)
OSF Healthcare Church Plan Challenge Dismissed
"OSF Healthcare System was founded by The Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis. It operates 11 acute care hospitals, home health-care services and other health-care facilities in Illinois and Michigan.... A class of plan participants challenged its church-plan status, but [the judge said] that 'the undisputed facts demonstrate that OSF shares common religious bonds and convictions' with the Roman Catholic Church." [Smith v. OSF Healthcare Sys., No. 16-467 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2018)] (Pensions & Investments)
The New Principal-Purpose Organization Question in Church Plan Litigation: Does the Committee 'Maintain' the Plan?
"[T]his decision is not a final determination on the merits but is, instead, a very carefully reasoned opinion on Dignity Health's motion to dismiss on the grounds that the plan in question is a church plan; the opinion goes to great lengths to emphasize that it may reach a different conclusion at the summary judgment stage. Nevertheless, the trial court's ruling does give credence to the plaintiffs' assertion that the Dignity Health plan was not 'maintained' by a principal-purpose organization described in ERISA Section 3(33)(C)(i)." [Rollins v. Dignity Health, No. 13-1450 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2018)] (Bradley)
District Court Opinion: Denial of Dignity Health's Motion to Dismiss Based on Church Plan Exemption (PDF)
19 pages. "Plaintiffs plausibly allege that the Plan is not properly maintained as a church plan. First, they allege that the Plan is 'maintained' by Dignity for its own and its affiliates' employees, and that Dignity is neither a church, a convention or association of churches, nor an organization whose principal purpose or function is the administration or funding of the Plan as required by section 1002(33)(C)(i).... If Congress had not intended to attach any significance to the word 'maintained,' it could have simply required that a plan be 'administered or funded' by a principal-purpose organization, and not also 'maintained' by one. It did not make that choice." [Rollins v. Dignity Health, No. 13-1450 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2018)] (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California)
Rhode Island May Require Transparency for Church Plans
"[Rhode Island state Treasurer Seth Magaziner] plans to seek legislation in the 2019 General Assembly session to require pension plans managed by religious organizations in Rhode Island to send regular ERISA-quality updates to plan participants." (Pensions & Investments)
[Guidance Overview] IRS Finds No Harm, No Foul for Church Plan Treatment
"[In PLR 201826009, the] IRS ruled that church plans that wish to be legally required to comply with ERISA and the Code requirements applicable to plans subject to ERISA must file an election prescribed under Code Section 410(d) ... [and] that the administration and operation of ... [the tax-qualified DB plan], as if it were subject to Title I of ERISA, does not constitute an election under Section 410(d)." (Greensfelder)
Rhode Island Law Will Facilitate Settlements in Lawsuits Over Failed St. Joseph's Pension Fund
"Legislation aimed at smoothing the way for settlements in the multiple class-action suits over the failed St. Joseph's Health Services pension plan has been signed into law by Gov. Gina Raimondo.... A General Assembly press release explained [that] the legislation ... 'provides that defendants entering good faith, judicially-approved settlements would not be liable for claims from co-defendants.... The finality of the settlement without fear of a contribution claim from a co-defendant, provides an incentive to settle.' " (Providence Journal)
Lawsuit Argues Health Provider Plan Lost Its Church Plan Status
"According to the complaint, [St. Joseph Health Services of Rhode Island (SJHSRI), which prior to the 2014 asset sale, owned Fatima Hospital,] no longer operates a hospital or otherwise provides health care. Instead, SJHSRI's business consists of defending lawsuits and workers' compensation claims, collecting certain debts and receivables, paying or settling certain liabilities which were excluded from the 2014 asset sale, and, until the Receiver was appointed, administering the plan." (planadviser)
Catholic Bishop of Providence, Hospital Operators Accused in Pension Lawsuit
"The suits filed in state and federal courts accuse Bishop Thomas Tobin and hospital operators of deliberately underfunding St. Joseph Health Services's pension plan and then lying about the plan's financial condition to beneficiaries and state regulators.... The pension was set up as a 'church plan' ... The federal lawsuit, however, says the plan did not qualify as a church plan at least since 2009, meaning the plan's operators would have been required to meet specific funding thresholds." (Rhode Island Public Radio)
Diocese of La Crosse Pension Plan Termination on Hold
"Bishop William Patrick Callahan informed pension members in early March of the decision to terminate the plan, which has been underfunded for years. However, according to a statement Wednesday from the diocese, that decision is on hold for an indeterminate amount of time." (Leader-Telegram)
District Court Refuses to Dismiss Former Committee Members from Church Plan Funding Lawsuit
"Former committee members for the pension plan of St. Elizabeth Medical Center moved to have themselves dismissed from a lawsuit challenging the church plan status of the pension plan, but a federal judge declined to dismiss them from a count regarding funding of the plan." [Boden v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center, No. 16-49 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 4, 2018)] (PLANSPONSOR)
Diocese of La Crosse Terminates Underfunded DB Plan
"[T]he Diocese of La Crosse plans to terminate its pension plan for lay employees this summer, replacing it with an undetermined one-time payment.... Bishop William Patrick Callahan informed members of the diocese's Lay Employees' Retirement Plan that the plan has been underfunded for years.... The pension plan covered Catholic school teachers, custodians, secretaries, rectory workers and other lay employees throughout the diocese, which serves 19 west-central Wisconsin counties[.]" (Leader-Telegram)
Court of Appeals Answers More Questions on Church Plan Exemption
"The first question decided by the Court: is the entity that offered the plan a tax-exempt organization that is associated with a church? ... The second issue decided by the Court: is the entity's retirement plan maintained by an organization whose principal purpose is administering or funding a retirement plan for entity employees? ... The third issue: is principal-purpose organization itself associated with a church? ... Finally, the Court rejected the claim that the church plan exemption violates the Establishment Clause." [Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, No. 16-1005 (10th Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)] (Hodgson Russ LLP)
Tenth Circuit Diminishes Ability to Challenge Church Plan Status of Healthcare Organization's Retirement Plan
"The Tenth Circuit analyzed these open issues by answering three questions: [1] Is the entity offering the plan a tax-exempt nonprofit organization associated with a church? [2] If so, is the entity's plan maintained by a principal-purpose organization? That is, is the plan maintained by an organization whose principal purpose is administering or funding a plan for entity employees? [3] If so, is that principal-purpose organization itself associated with a church?" [Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, No. 16-1005 (10th Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)] (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Church Plan Challenges Lead Uptick in ERISA Class Action Settlements in 2017
"Class-action lawsuit settlements reached a record $2.7 billion in 2017, with $927.8 million coming from the 10 largest ERISA cases ... a sharp increase from $807.4 million in 2016, but lower than $1.31 billion in 2015 ... The largest ERISA settlement was Providence Health & Services, which paid $352 million to settle a church-plan challenge. Six of the 10 largest settlements in 2017 were related to church-plan challenges." (Pensions & Investments)
Ascension Health Gets OK for $29.5M Deal to End ERISA Suit
"The settlement requires Ascension to guarantee $29.5 million of benefits to class members in the event that trust assets in the plan dip below that number. Judge Feinerman noted that the settlement came after the Supreme Court issued its decision in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, which extended ERISA's 'church plan' exemption to any benefit plan maintained by a church affiliate even if it wasn't originally established by a church." (Cohen Milstein)
Tenth Circuit Agrees with District Court That Catholic Health Initiative's Plan Is a 'Church Plan' (PDF)
"[T]he Tenth Circuit directly addressed several key issues left open by the Supreme Court in Advocate Health, including [1] whether an internal plan administrative committee can qualify as a 'principal-purpose organization' that maintains a church plan, [2] what it means to 'maintain' a plan for purposes of the church plan exemption, and [3] whether the church plan exemption is constitutional under the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.... [T]he Tenth Circuit decided each of these issues favorably to CHI and other religiously-affiliated healthcare systems." [Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, No. 16-1005 (10th Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)] (Groom Law Group)
Feds Defend Pension Law's Religious Exemption
"[T]he government argued that [ERISA's] 'church plan' provision is constitutional because it has a secular legislative purpose and neither advances nor hinders religion. This is the first time the government has publicly commented on the constitutionality of the exemption in the four years since it's become a controversial issue driving dozens of ERISA class actions." [Sanzone v. Mercy Health, No. 16-923 (E.D. Mo., gov't memo filed Dec. 11, 2017) (Bloomberg BNA)
Supreme Court Broadly Interprets Scope of ERISA's Church Plan Exemption (PDF)
"As the Court itself noted, the decision does not address other issues raised by the employees, such as whether the hospitals even 'have the needed [degree of] association with a church' to invoke application of the exemption at all. Instead, technically, the decision only resolves the question of whether those hospitals can rely on the exemption regardless of who established their pension plans in the first place." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 5, 2017)] (The Wagner Law Group, via Plan Consultant)
Church Retirement Plans and Retired Ministers May Be Impacted by District Court's Housing Allowance Ruling
"On Oct. 6, 2017, ... Judge Barbara Crabb of the Western District of Wisconsin held that Section 107(2) of the Internal Revenue Code violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Code Section 107(2) provides that a minister can exclude from gross income a cash housing allowance provided to the minister as pay for services in the exercise of ministry. The ruling, if upheld, would have a significant impact on ministers who have a portion of their salaries designated as housing allowance, as well as their employing churches. Moreover, it would have a significant impact on church retirement plans and retired ministers who designate a portion of their retirement income as housing allowance excludible from taxable income."[Gaylor v. Mnuchin, No. 16-215 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 6, 2017)] (Ice Miller LLP)
St. Joseph's Healthcare Settles Challenge to Church Plan Status
"The agreement calls for St. Joseph to contribute $42.5 million within 60 days. If funding becomes insufficient to pay benefits over the next seven years, St. Joseph's must guarantee to ensure that all accrued benefits are paid. Those benefits are protected for seven years if the plan is amended or terminated, or if it is merged with another plan. Plan amendments call for the plan to be closed by Dec. 31, 2018." (Pensions & Investments)
St. Joseph's Nurses Get Initial OK for $42M ERISA Settlement
"Nurses with New Jersey's St. Joseph's Healthcare System won preliminary court approval for a $42 million settlement of claims that the system underfunded their pension plan -- a deal that was reached after the U.S. Supreme Court said church-affiliated entities are exempt from [ERISA]." (Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, via Trial)
[Guidance Overview] A Primer on Church Retirement Plans (PDF)
10 pages. "[This article] provides a general description of church plan status, notes issues affecting church retirement plans, and discusses special rules applicable to these plans under the Internal Revenue Code and [ERISA]." (Ice Miller LLP, via Thomson Reuters Practical Law)
[Guidance Overview] Comparison of Retirement Programs Available to Church and Church-Related Employers (PDF)
13 pages. "This chart compares retirement programs that are 'tax-qualified' under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition to these options, a non-qualified church controlled employer (non-QCCO) can establish a Code Section 457(f) ineligible deferred compensation plan. A church or qualified church controlled organization (QCCO) cannot establish a 457(f) plan, but can establish a non-qualified deferred compensation plan under Code Sections 451 and 83. This chart covers the general rules that apply to each of these types of retirement programs to provide context. However, the rules that apply only to church and church-related employers are bolded in red." (Ice Miller LLP)
Ascension Health Grants $29.5M Backstop for Wheaton Pension
"Ascension Health will guarantee $29.5 million in benefit payments under Wheaton Franciscan Services Inc.'s pension plan, ending a lawsuit accusing Wheaton of wrongly treating the plan as a 'church plan' exempt from federal law ... The deal, announced in court papers filed Sept. 1, requires Ascension to guarantee payment of the first $29.5 million paid out under the Wheaton pension plan in the event the plan can't cover the payments itself. Ascension, which acquired part of Wheaton's health-care business in 2016, also agreed to provide plan participants with annual notices of the plan's funding levels." [In re Wheaton Franciscan ERISA Litig., No. 16-4232 (N.D. Ill. motion for preliminary settlement approval filed 9/1/17 ] (Bloomberg BNA)
Diocese Failed to Make Contributions to Hospital Employees' Pension Fund for Years
"While records are incomplete, it is clear that between 2008 and time of the sale of the hospital in 2014, the Diocese repeatedly underfunded retirement payments or made no payment ... It is unclear how many years before 2008 the failure to make payments and partial payments goes back.... The bankruptcy of the pension fund impacts 2,800 and is the largest failure in Rhode Island history. The pension fund has a deficit of more than $160 million." (GoLocalProv)
Pension Fund for Hospital Nurses Placed in Receivership
"The [DB] plan for nurses at Our Lady of Fatima Hospital and the former St. Joseph's Hospital was placed in temporary receivership last week after fund actuaries said it faced insolvency just three years after the hospitals were sold to a California-based for-profit company. The plan is 'severely underfunded and requires additional capital of over $43 million to reach a 100-percent funding level,' St. Joseph Health Services of Rhode Island Inc. wrote in a petition asking the court to appoint a receiver and approve a 40-percent across the board reduction in benefits to pension recipients.... According to the receivership petition, the plan is expected to lose religious exemption and begin owing PBGC premium payments in 2018." (Providence Journal)
Supreme Court Church Plan Ruling May Bring Wider Interpretation in the Future
"This ruling significantly weakens the retirement security of participants in benefits plans managed by religiously affiliated health-care organizations.... However, the ruling does have a perversely beneficial effect for the same group of employees. Insured health, disability and life programs administered by the same organizations that have been exempted from ERISA as church plans will regain the protection of state laws that protect consumers, including the right to sue for damages and penalties for bad faith claim handling." (DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari, PC)
Another Question is Answered in the Who's the Employer Q&A Column
"Which employers can sponsor a 'church plan,' and which employees can such a plan cover?" (S. Derrin Watson, on BenefitsLink)
Hospitals' Supreme Court Victory Leaves Unresolved Questions for Church Plan Sponsors
"The Supreme Court did not address two important additional questions related to the church plan analysis. These questions will almost certainly be litigated by future plaintiffs against church-related organizations that establish and maintain church plans. The Court also did not decide the case on constitutional grounds, leaving open the opportunity for plaintiffs' counsel to continue to make the argument that the church plan exemption from ERISA is itself unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Establishment Clause." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Ice Miller LLP)
Supreme Court Decision Offers Some Relief to Church-Affiliated Nonprofits Using ERISA Church Plan Exemption
"[C]hurch affiliates relying on the principal-purpose organization basis to classify their plans as church plans should review their plan governance structure to ensure that they can show that their plans are maintained by an organization that is controlled by or associated with a church and that has the principal purpose of overseeing employee benefit plans of churches or church affiliates. Control of a principal-purpose organization by a church can be shown by a church's control over the appointment of the organization's manager or majority of board members. Association with a church is a subjective analysis that considers whether the organization shares common religious bonds and conventions with that church." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Ford & Harrison LLP)
New Questions for Church-Affiliated Organizations After Supreme Court Addresses ERISA Church Plan Exemption
"Although Stapleton provides church-affiliated organizations with more freedom from ERISA's requirements, the decision raises new questions: What organizations are sufficiently church-affiliated to qualify as principal-purpose organizations for the exemption? ... Will plaintiffs pursue alternative state-law claims against church plan? ... Will Congress take action to narrow the church-plan exemption?" [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Lane Powell PC)
Another Question is Answered in the Who's the Employer Q&A Column
"What's the significance of the recent Supreme Court decision on church plans?" (S. Derrin Watson, on BenefitsLink)
Moody's: Supreme Court Ruling on 'Church Plans' Positive for Faith-Based Hospitals
"A note from Moody's Investors Service says faith-based healthcare organizations will benefit from a recent Supreme Court ruling that deems 'church plans' are exempt from [ERISA's] minimum funding requirements." (HealthLeaders Media)
Supreme Court Ruling Ends the Battle But Not the War: What Church-Affiliated Church Plan Sponsors Need to Know and Do Now
"To prepare for the next wave of such church plan exemption challenges, non-church organizations that sponsor church plans should thoroughly review the legal structure and operation of the entity that maintains the plan to ensure it is a 'principal-purpose organization'.... [T]he Third and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals [had] expressed serious doubt as to whether the defendant hospitals' principal purpose of providing healthcare satisfied the principal purpose test." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP)
Highest Court Recognizes Highest Power: Church-Owned Businesses Secure Supreme Court Win (PDF)
"[T]he Supreme Court has overturned decisions at both district and appellate levels and from the Third, Seventh, and Ninth circuits, which had taken a seemingly rogue view that ERISA's plain text required that a church be the sponsor of the plan for the plan to qualify for the church plan exemption.... For churches and their affiliates, this legal victory essentially means things return to the status quo of the past 30 years. But it is important that church plan sponsors do not mistake 'exempt from ERISA' for 'absolved of fiduciary responsibility.' " [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Lockton)
ERISA 'Church Plan' Exemption Applies to Religiously Affiliated Hospital Plans
"Nonprofit religious organizations who have relied upon the church plan exemption can take some comfort from the Advocate Health Care Network decision, but they still must assess: whether they can establish 'principal-purpose organization' status; whether maintaining a church-plan exemption is worth the litigation risk; and whether complying with ERISA requirements is an acceptable alternative." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (McGuireWoods LLP)
Church Plan Sponsors Should Take Action to Shore Up Exemption
"Any church-affiliated organization that has not established a formal governance structure for plans that it intends to treat as church plans should do so.... A church-affiliated employer that has already established a formal governance structure for its church plans may wish to consider a 'rebranding' ... of its plan administrative committee in a way that would help support the current and historic status of such committee as a principal-purpose organization.... Finally, any plan that is intended to be maintained as a church plan should be reviewed, and amended if necessary, to assure that it does not contain terms and provisions that invoke ERISA." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Verrill Dana LLP)
Church-Affiliated Hospitals Fall Within ERISA's Church Plan Exemption
"Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a separate concurring opinion to express her concern over the possibility that the Court's decision could cause many employees who work for organizations that act and operate like secular businesses to be denied ERISA's protections. She invited Congress to correct the result because these 'organizations bear little resemblance' to those Congress considered when enacting the amendment." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Eversheds Sutherland)
Supreme Court Interprets 'Church Plan' Exemption in Favor of Religious Charities
"The next chapter may turn upon challenges to whether a hospital is 'religious' enough to qualify for the exemption. Such arguments will invite inquiries into the steps that churches have taken to maintain the religious mission of their affiliated hospitals, buttressed by the protections of the First Amendment that prevent civil government from intruding upon religious rights of autonomy and self-governance or favoring one form of religious structure over another." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Stradley Ronon)
Supreme Court Finds 'Church Plans' Need Not Be Established by Churches (PDF)
"The Supreme Court's decision unquestionably is a significant victory for religiously-affiliated non-profits and their pension plans. The Court resolved the threshold statutory interpretation question in their favor, holding that their plans can qualify as church plans exempt from ERISA's requirements. The Court's opinion, however, leaves several issues concerning the church plan definition unresolved." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Groom Law Group)
Supreme Court: 'Church Plans' Include Those Established by Church-Affiliated Organizations
"The Supreme Court decision averts what would have potentially been a cataclysmic result to many faith-based hospitals, nursing homes and schools that were counting on being exempt from having their retirement plans subject to the requirements of ERISA. However, some questions remain, because the court did not address the question of the scope of the definition of a 'church-affiliated organization' (or the technical term used in the statute), which could also have an impact on which organizations may operate an ERISA-exempt church plan.... Congress may still ultimately have the last word." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (McDonald Hopkins)
Unanimous Supreme Court Decision in Favor of 'Church Plan' Defendants But Is More Litigation Coming?
"Although this decision is positive news for church plans, it may not be the end of the church plan litigation. Numerous, large settlements have occurred before and since the Supreme Court took up the consolidated cases ... [S]ome will still settle, albeit likely for lower numbers. In addition, Plaintiffs could still push forward with the cases on the grounds that the entities maintaining the church plans are not 'principal-purpose organizations' controlled by 'a church.' " [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Jackson Lewis P.C.)
Church-Affiliated Employers Get Win As SCOTUS Clarifies ERISA Exemption
"The opinion also analyzes the difference between the terms 'establish' and 'maintain' in the context of ERISA plans, concluding that the terms are often used interchangeably. In terms of compliance with ERISA's regulatory scheme, the Court said, it is of more significance which entity maintains a plan than who originally established the plan." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Fisher Phillips)
Supreme Court's 'Church Plan' Decision Leaves Key Issue Undecided
"[T]he Court noted that its ruling did not address a second requirement of the law, that an exempt church plan be maintained by an 'organization' that has administration of the plan as its principal purpose.... In its opinion, the Court noted that this issue and a second issue were not before it, and nothing said in the opinion 'expresses a view of how they should be resolved.' The retirement security of hundreds of thousands of current and former employees of religiously-affiliated hospitals, schools, and social services agencies remains in limbo until these issues are addressed." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Pension Rights Center)
Supreme Court Unanimously Upholds ERISA Exemption for Church-Affiliated Pension Plans
"[T]he employees needed to persuade the justices that waiving the establishment requirement for affiliate-maintained plans was not simply odd ... but so bizarre that the justices should walk away from a straightforward reading of the language.... Although Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined Kagan's opinion ... she pointedly notes that 'organizations such as petitioners operate for-profit subsidiaries, employ thousands of employees, earn billions of dollars in revenue, and compete in the secular market with companies that must bear the cost of complying with ERISA.... This current reality might prompt Congress to take a different path.' " [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (SCOTUSblog)
Text of Supreme Court Opinion: DB Plan of Church-Affiliated Organization is 'Church Plan' Regardless of Who Established It (PDF)
21 pages; unanimous opinion. "That use of the word 'include' is not literal, but tells readers that a different type of plan should receive the same treatment (i.e., an exemption) as the type described in the old definition. In other words, because Congress deemed the category of plans 'established and maintained by a church' to 'include' plans 'maintained by' principal-purpose organizations, those plans -- and all those plans -- are exempt from ERISA's requirements.... Both parties' accounts of Congress's purpose in enacting sub-paragraph (C)(i) tend to confirm this Court's reading that plans maintained by principal-purpose organizations are eligible for the church-plan exemption, whatever their origins." [Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, No. 16-74 (U.S. June 3, 2017)] (Supreme Court of the United States)
Bon Secours Agrees to $98 Million Settlement in Church Pension Funding Suit
"The deal, announced in court papers filed May 31, requires the hospital to contribute $98 million to its pension plans over a seven-year period. This payment represents the 'total amount' of plan underfunding at the time of the settlement, according to the filing. The hospital also agreed to pay $300,000 to 530 employees who would have received additional benefits had the hospital used a pension-vesting schedule that complied with [ERISA]." (Bloomberg BNA)
Another Health System Settles Church Plan Challenge
"A preliminary settlement has been reached in a case challenging the 'church plan' status of pension plans for Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System.... According to the settlement agreement, Franciscan will contribute $125 million to the plans in the next five years, pay $450 to each of the more than 2,000 participants of the plans who accepted a lump-sum buyout of their balance in 2016, and guarantee participants will be paid the pension benefits they were promised for the next 15 years." (planadviser)
In Absence of Help from Archdiocese, New Jersey Hospital Pensioners Put Faith in U.S. Supreme Court
"While adversaries argued in front of the U.S. Supreme Court last week, 79 people who once worked at St. James Hospital in Newark watched the clock.... Their pension fund would go belly up in less than a month.... They would lose retirement income that was promised for a lifetime. And no one is taking responsibility. But the case being decided by the highest court in the land could give new hope to the pensioners[.]" (
[Opinion] Notes (and a Prediction) on the Supreme Court Argument on Church Plans
"As the current litigation over the scope of the church plan exemption has demonstrated, the original assumption that the exemption should be broadly applied has a questionable foundation, and was not founded on the type of rigorous, extensive research and analysis we would normally assume underlies a significant act of statutory interpretation. And this, as much as any other reason, is why we are in the middle of very contentious and financially significant class action litigation over the scope of the church plan exemption, which has now landed in the Supreme Court." (Stephen Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group)
Audio of Supreme Court Oral Argument in Consolidated Church Plan Cases
Available in MP3, Windows Media and RealAudio formats. [Advocate Health v. Stapleton, Nos. 16-74, 16-86, 16-258 (consolidated cases argued Mar. 27, 2017)] (Supreme Court of the United States)
About Us


Privacy Policy

Post a Job

Advertise in the BenefitsLink Newsletters

Add Your Company to the Directory of Vendors and Software

Submit a News Item, Press Release, Webcast or Conference

Contact Us

Payment Portal

© 2019, Inc.