BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo

Subscribe to Newsletters



Search the News


Featured Jobs
Administrative Consultant for Qualified Retirement Plans
DC Plan Administrator
Senior Plan Administrator
Pension Administrative Consultant
Defined Contribution Pension Administrator
Search all jobs
 
Get the BenefitsLink app for iPhone and iPadLinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson

Effect of S Corp Status on Controlled Group Determination

(Posted August 8, 2001)

Question 118: A owns 100% of S-corp 1. A and B each own 50% of S-corp 2. A and B would like to have one qualified plan for the 2 S-corps. Does the fact that the companies are S-corps have any bearing on the controlled group determination? Could they have a multiple-employer plan? Would that be better than being a controlled group?

Answer: Status as an S or a C corporation is irrelevant in determining if a controlled group exists. It matters in determining whether a corporation is in an affiliated service group or is a related party, but it has no effect on controlled group status.

In the situation you describe, a controlled group does not exist. A's "effective control" ownership is 50% and B's is 0%, so together they do not have more than 50% effective control. Moreover, because we exclude B in determining a controlling interest, thanks to the Vogel Fertilizer case, a controlling interest does not exist.

As it is now, can the two corporations adopt a single plan? Of course they can, and it would be considered a multiple employer plan. Each employer would need to be tested separately in determining if the plan passes the requirements of the Code, and the plan would be required to file two Schedule T's with each year's 5500 filing.

The easiest way to create a controlled group is to sell B one share of stock in S-Corp 1, or give him an option to buy that one share. That will allow the corporations to be treated as a controlled group. That means the two will be tested together and will file only one Schedule T. Alternatively, B could sell (or give A an option to buy) 30% of S-Corp 2. Of course, either of these moves has significant tax and nontax consequences outside the realm of qualified plans and should be undertaken only after carefully reviewing the entire situation.

The controlled group rules are discussed at length in chapters 6 through 10 of my book, Who's the Employer?.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:
 
Webmaster:
© 2017 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
Privacy Policy