Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

DC Plan Administrator
Heritage Administrative Services, LLC
(Woodbury NY)
DC Plan Administrator

The Benefit Advantage
(Auburn Hills MI / Telecommute)
Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

The MandMarblestone Group, llc
(Philadelphia PA / Telecommute)
Retirement Plan Administrator

Group RHI
(Telecommute)
Defined Contribution Plan Specialist

Aprio
(Alpharetta GA / AL / NC / Telecommute)
Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

AimPoint Pension
(Telecommute)
ESOP Administrator

Blue Ridge ESOP Associates
(VA / Telecommute)
Pension Systems Administrator
DeMars Pension Consulting Services, Inc.
(Overland Park KS)
Retirement Plan Consultant

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Telecommute)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Marital Attribution Strikes Again!

(Posted September 26, 2001)

Question 131: Corporation A is taxed as a "C" corporation. It's owned 50/50 by husband and wife. Now they want to start Corporation B as a management company, to be taxed as an "S" corporation. Are the two corporations a controlled group if Corporation B is also owned 50/50? What if Corporation B were owned 90/10?

Answer: For controlled group purposes, there is always attribution between husband and wife unless either (1) they are divorced (final or interlocutory) or separated; or (2) the noninvolvement exception applies. One of the conditions of the noninvolvement exception is that the one spouse doesn't own any of the stock directly, which isn't the case on the facts you cite.

Hence, regardless of the ratios, husband will be deemed to own wife's stock, and vice versa, in both corporations. Therefore, one person is deemed to own 100% of both corporations. That's a controlled group!

In fact, it will be a controlled group, assuming the parties are happily married, unless one spouse owns 100% of one business and the other owns 100% of the other business. (Even then, a controlled group may exist. See Q&A 111 for more details.)

But take attribution out of the picture just for a moment. Suppose this couple is living together without benefit of clergy, and they have no children. In that case, there would be no attribution. If each owns 50% of each business, then you have two owners owning identical interests in two corporations, a very clear controlled group. Shifting it to 90/10 doesn't help. Their effective control ownership would be 60%, which is more than the required "more than 50%" standard, and their controlling interest is still 100%.

If they want to break up the controlled group, they need to bring in an outside shareholder for one of the two businesses who would own more than 20% of the business. Even then, they need to beware of the attribution and exclusion rules.

These issues are discussed in more detail in Chapters 6 and 7 of my book, Who's the Employer?.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.