Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions

Featured Jobs

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Defined Contribution Analyst

The Benefit Practice
(Stamford CT / Maitland FL)

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Premier Plan Consultants
(Telecommute / San Diego CA)

Manager, 5500 Team

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Administrator

Benefit Associates, Inc.
(Telecommute / Huntington Beach CA)

DC Administrator

MGKS
(Telecommute / Phoenix AZ)

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

Pension Plan Administrator

DeMars Pension Consulting Services, Inc.
(Overland Park KS)

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Convertible Stock Constituting An Option

(Posted April 6, 2002)

Question 151: Company A owns 66% of the common stock of Company B and 100% of the nonvoting convertible preferred stock of Company B. The remaining common stock is owned by an unrelated entity. If Company A were to convert all of the preferred stock into common stock, Company A would own more than 80% of the common stock of Company B. Are Company A and Company B in a controlled group? In other words, is convertible preferred stock treated like an option for purposes of the attribution rules?

Answer: You've hit the issue squarely on the head.

We start with concept that nonvoting preferred stock is generally excluded in determining controlled group status. But, in this case, it is convertible.

What does that conversion right mean? It means that when A chooses to do so, A has the ability to acquire X shares more of the common stock of B. Instead of paying for this new common stock in cash, A will pay for it by surrendering its nonvoting preferred stock.

To me, that meets every test for an "option." So what if the option price isn't payable in cash? A can acquire, by its own choice, more stock in B, with no conditions other than surrendering a preagreed price.

So, because of the constructive ownership rules of Code section 1563, A is deemed to own more than 80% of the common stock of B. Thus A and B are a parent-subsidiary controlled group. This would be true both for retirement plan purposes and ordinary income tax purposes.

The option attribution rule is discussed at length as a part of Chapter 7 of my book, Who's the Employer.

Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.