Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Post and Distribute
Your Jobs
ARPA News
ARPA Webcasts

Featured Jobs

DB Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

The Nolan Company logo

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Miller Johnson logo

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

Primark Benefits logo

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Premier Plan Consultants
(Telecommute / San Diego CA)

Premier Plan Consultants logo

DC Administrator

MGKS
(Telecommute / Phoenix AZ)

MGKS logo

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

TPS Group logo

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Administrator

Benefit Associates, Inc.
(Telecommute / Huntington Beach CA)

Benefit Associates, Inc. logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

The Nolan Company logo

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Human Interest logo

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

Human Interest logo

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

Associated Pension Consultants logo

Manager, 5500 Team

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

401K Generation logo

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Management Function Group and Common Control Group

(Posted December 10, 1999)

Question 40: Corporation A, which maintains a qualified plan, is the general partner of Limited Partnership B. Corporation A owns a 1% general partner interest and a 2% limited partner interest in Limited Partnership B. The remaining 97% interest in Limited Partnership B is publicly held.

Corporation A also is the general partner of Limited Partnerships C, D, E and F and owns a 1% general partner interest in each. Limited Partnership B owns a 99% limited partner interest in each of Limited Partnerships C, D, E and F. The partnerships invest in real estate. A's only business is to function as a general partner of these 5 partnerships.

Limited Partnership C owns 100% of the stock of Corporation G, which maintains a qualified plan.

Do these entities (or at least Corporations A and G) constitute a single employer under Code Section 414? Does Corporation A's status as general partner of Limited Partnerships B, C, D, E and F trigger an affiliated service group?

Answer: Let's ignore A for a moment. B owns 99% of C, D, E, and F. Hence those five partnerships are under common control under 414(c) as a parent-subsidiary group. Moreover, because C owns 100% of G, G is a part of that same parent-subsidiary group. That means all 6 are treated as a single entity for most qualified plan purposes.

Now we come to A. The mere fact that A holds a minority interest in the various partnerships does not make A part of the common control group. The fact that the partnerships invest in real estate means they are not service organizations, so we cannot construct a traditional affiliated service group between A and the other entities.

But what about a management function group under 414(m)(5)? A's principal business purpose (indeed, its sole business) is to provide management functions to B and entities related to B (specifically, C, D, E, and F). Hence, those 6 businesses are a management function affiliated service group.

Whether G is technically part of the affiliated service group is subject to some doubt, based on the wording of the statute. (See Q 13:20 of my book, Who's the Employer?.)

However, because entities B through G are considered a single employer, and A through F are considered a single employer, it makes logical sense to treat the entire group, A through G, as though they were one employer, at least to the extent 414(m) and 414(c) overlap (which is the case for most of the employee benefit Internal Revenue Code sections).


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2021 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.