Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions

Featured Jobs

DC Administrator

MGKS
(Telecommute / Phoenix AZ)

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Defined Benefit Retirement Plan Administrator

Benefit Associates, Inc.
(Telecommute / Huntington Beach CA)

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Premier Plan Consultants
(Telecommute / San Diego CA)

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

Manager, 5500 Team

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

DB Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Shared Employees

(Posted August 22, 2000)

Question 56: If Dentist Able and Dentist Baker are each sole proprietors, operating in the same office and sharing the staff employees 50/50, can each have his or her own retirement plan, taking into account just his or her share of the staff employees' payroll and hours worked? Please assume there is no entity combining the two sole proprietorships.

Answer: This is a fairly classic shared employee situation. I discuss this at length in Chapter 5 of my book, Who's the Employer?, but here's a quick summary.

The staff members in a shared employee situation, according to some old revenue rulings, work for both dentists. Each dentist must credit each employee with his or her full hours of service. In other words, the receptionist is working 2,000 hours/year for Dentist Able and 2,000 hours/year for Dentist Baker. This position is supported by general common law principles and by reality.

Each dentist credits each employee with the dentist's pro rata share of the employee's compensation. So, each dentist is deemed to have paid the employee half of the employee's salary.

Suppose I'm a billing clerk working there. I work 1,800 hours a year and make $24,000. Able has a 15% profit sharing plan and Baker has a 10% money purchase pension plan. At 1,800 hours, I meet the eligibility requirements for both plans easily. A will put away $1,800 for me, and B will contribute $1,200.

Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.