Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Display and Distribute
Your Job Openings
COVID-19 News
COVID-19 Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

The MandMarblestone Group, llc
(Telecommute / Philadelphia PA)

The MandMarblestone Group, llc logo

Retirement Plan Manager / Senior Administrator

Southern Pension Services
(Tampa FL)

Southern Pension Services logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Cetera Retirement Plan Specialists
(Telecommute)

Cetera Retirement Plan Specialists logo

Director of Business Development

ERISA Pros, LLC
(Atlanta GA)

ERISA Pros, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Definiti
(Telecommute / Dallas TX / University Place WA / The Woodlands TX)

Definiti logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Telecommute)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

401(k) Client Support Specialist

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

401K Generation logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Common Control Sponsor Withdrawal

(Posted October 24, 2000)

Question 62: What rules apply when a partnership that has been a participating employer in a 401(k) plan of a group of trades or businesses under common control chooses to withdraw from the plan (no spinoff or other transaction involved, just an amendment to cease being a participating employer)? Are the rules any different from the rules that would apply if the partnership had initially chosen not to be a participating employer?

Answer: Without a doubt, the most important thing to remember about controlled groups under Internal Revenue Code section 414(b), groups of trades or businesses under common control under section 414(c), and affiliated service groups under section 414(m) is that the employees of all group members are treated as employed by a single employer for purposes of most Code provisions relating to qualified plans.

Therefore, the way to handle most all questions that ask about the consequences of affiliated group membership is to ask, "How would I handle this if I were talking about one division of a single company, rather than two companies?" Almost always, that will lead you to the correct answer.

In this case, suppose you had the Acme company with two divisions, sales and administration. Acme has sponsored the plan for years covering both divisions, but now decides to pull administration out of the plan, so the plan will only cover sales. Can it do so? Sure. What are the consequences? Everyone from both divisions are still employees, and still have to be considered in testing for satisfying the coverage requirements, for example, but iif you can pass the various tests, happy day. Have the administration employees separated from service? No, of course not. Is it a partial termination? Almost undoubtedly.

Apply the same reasoning to the situation in the question.

Incidentally, IRC 410(b)(6)(C) does not apply to this situation to give you a free pass of the coverage rules. This is not a change in group membership. Rather it is a change in group sponsorship.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.