BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo
Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Consultant (Portland OR / Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Administrator (Fort Worth TX)
Retirement Plan Administrator (Colorado Springs CO / Telecommute)

Senior Defined Contribution Account Manager (Houston TX / Dallas TX / Austin TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator (Philadelphia PA / Telecommute)

Plan Administrator (Lake Mary FL / Richmond VA / Dallas TX / Los Angeles CA)
Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Get the BenefitsLink appLinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Stop, Look & Listen: Railroad Retirement Benefits Q&A

Answers are provided by Robert S. Kaufman

Repeal of Social Security Earnings Restrictions for People Over 65 and its Impact on Railroad Retirement

(Posted March 2, 2000)

Question 48: If Congress ends earnings restrictions for Social Security receipients over 65, will they also end for Railroad retirees?
This change represents a "benefit increase" for working beneficiaries -- how can the Social Security fund afford this, when there are long-term financial problems?

Answer: The proposal unanimously passed the House of Repersentatives on March 1, 2000. If it is passed by the Senate and signed into law by President Clinton, it would end the unpopular earnings restrictions for those working Social Security beneficiaries who are ages 65 to 69, retroactive to January 1, 2000. (Those restrictions for people age 70 and older were eliminated many years ago.)

The new rules also would apply to Railroad Retirement. However, it would not change the special Railroad Retirement restrictions for post-retirement employment in the rail industry or for the last non-rail company worked before retirement.

It also would not change the more restrictive earnings restrictions for Social Security and Railroad Retirement beneficiaries between age 60 and 65, or the special restrictions for disabled beneficiaries under 65.

Financing the change in the short-term is not a problem if the projected budget surplus continues. The costs are partially offset by increases in both income tax and Social Security(Railroad Retirement) tax receipts if more people decide to work after 65. SSA estimates that about 3% of their beneficiaries lose part or all of their benefits due to working.

The restrictions always have been unpopular, from the beginning of the Social Security program. Although they have been liberalized considerably over the years, Congress seems to have grown tired of the complaints, and with the budget surplus feels it can now deal politically with the change. Look for final action later this year.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1997-2017 Robert S. Kaufman
Related links:
 
About Us

Testimonials

Privacy Policy

Post a Job

Advertise in the BenefitsLink Newsletters

Add Your Company to the Directory of Vendors and Software

Submit a News Item, Press Release, Webcast or Conference

Contact Us

Payment Portal

© 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.