Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Display and Distribute
Your Job Openings
COVID-19 News
COVID-19 Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Manager, Defined Contributions Administration

Definiti
(Telecommute / The Woodlands TX / University Place WA / Dallas TX / Erie PA / Canonsburg PA / West Palm Beach FL)

Defined Contribution Administrator

PACETPA
(Telecommute / Clovis CA / Las Vegas NV)

PACETPA logo

Trust Funds Accountant

RFK Medical Plan/JDLC Pension Plan
(Keene CA)

Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates
(Telecommute / Encino CA)

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates logo

Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

401k America
(Telecommute / Chino CA)

Defined Benefits Combo Cash Balance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Telecommute)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Director, Retirement Benefits

Wespath Benefits and Investments
(Telecommute / Glenview IL)

Wespath Benefits and Investments logo

5500 Specialist

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

401K Generation logo

Client Service Manager

July Business Services
(Telecommute / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Controlled Groups, Common Control and SEPs

(Posted September 4, 2001)

Question 123: Because a SEP is not a qualified plan, can two sole proprietors (X and Y) that are members of a controlled group have two separate SEPs and ignore the controlled group rules?

Answer: No. Of course, two sole proprietorships technically couldn't be a "controlled group" because that applies only to incorporated entities, but they could be a group of trades or businesses under common control pursuant to Code section 414(c), perhaps through the attribution rules.

Either way, the answer is the same. Both IRC 414(b) and 414(c) refer not only to the controlled group rules, but also to the SEP rules and the SIMPLE rules. Thus all employees of both X and Y are deemed to be employed by a single employer for purposes of SEPs, SIMPLEs, and qualified plans. Accordingly, when the SEP rules require that all employees meeting certain requirements be covered, that includes all employees at both proprietorships.

Now, I have a question for you: you knew it was too good to be true, didn't you?

For more information on the effect of controlled group or common control status, see Chapter 10 of my book, Who's the Employer?.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.