Featured Jobs
|
Manager - Defined Contribution Plans M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
|
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
|
NFL Player Benefit Office
|
|
MGKS
|
|
Sr. Retirement Plan Administrator Tycor Benefit Administrators, Inc.
|
|
Junior Implementation Specialist - 401(k) Administration Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
|
|
Site Manager / Senior Administrator Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
|
Hessel & Associates, LLC
|
|
Aimpoint Pension
|
|
Retirement, LLC
|
|
United Benefit Pensions Inc.
|
|
Retirement, LLC
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group
|
|
Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group
|
|
Compliance Analyst - 401(k) Administration Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
Who's the Employer?
Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APMFiling for Midyear Changes in Controlled Group Status
| Question 125: Parent Company sells one of its subsidiary companies, Company B, in a stock sale on November 15, 2000. Company B continues as a participating employer in Parent Plan until March 1, 2001 when it establishes its own Plan and a transfer of assets from Parent Plan to new Company B Plan occurs thereafter. Parent Plan realizes it needs to be treated as a Multiple Employer Plan for January 1, 2001 - February 28, 2001. The question is whether it is also a Multiple Employer Plan from November 15, 2000 - December 31, 2000, or may it continue as a controlled group plan for 5500 reporting and testing purposes through December 31, 2000 by treating Company B as an additional component member of the group for the entire 2000 Plan Year under rules akin to the additional component member rules of Code Section 1563(b)(3)? | |
|
Answer: IRC 1563(b) contains several important rules to make the controlled group system more rational and easier to administer. These rules say that if you are in a group for half a year, you are a component member of the group for the whole year. They also remove foreign corporations as component members of controlled groups, and effectively eliminate overlapping groups.
Fortunately, it should not be much of an issue here. The only difference between filing for a multiple employer plan and a single employer plan is that you must file an extra Schedule T to show testing for IRC 410(b). That extra schedule T for the two months in question should be quite easy to fill out, because the plan should qualify for the free pass of IRC 410(b)(6)(C). Fill out the front page, check box 3e, and it's done. Of course, having said that you have a free pass of IRC 410(b), that does not mean you have a free pass for IRC 401(a)(4). Technically, for the two month period, the two must be tested separately. I know of no guidance on how this is to be done. Make a reasonable choice and it is unlikely you will be challenged. The component member rules are discussed in Chapter 9 of my book, Who's the Employer?. Changes in status are discussed in Chapter 11. |
Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.
The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.
Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
| Related links: |
