Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions

Featured Jobs

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

DC or DB Administrator

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Telecommute / Tacoma WA / Tualatin OR / Littleton CO)

DB Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Retirement Plan Administrator

My Benefits, LLC
(Telecommute / Daphne AL / Atlantic Beach FL)

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company
(Telecommute / Winter Park FL)

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

Retirement Plan Administrator (Account Manager)

Kushner & Company
(Telecommute / Portage MI)

Plan Document Specialist

Jocelyn Pension Consulting
(Telecommute / Boulder CO / San Rafael CA)

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

Retirement Plan Administrator

RSW & Associates
(CT / NJ / NY)

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Client Organizations and Recipients

(Posted May 27, 2002)

Question 186: What's the difference between a "Client Organization" (CO) under Rev. Proc. 2002-21 and a "recipient" under the leased employee rules of IRC 414(n)?

Answer: There is no difference other than a difference in perspective. But that difference is critical to understanding the relationship between the leased employee rules of IRC 414(n) and the PEO rules of Rev. Proc. 2002-21.

The leased employee rules affect the leased employee and the recipient organization (the organization receiving the individual's services). Those rules say that the recipient must treat the leased employee as its employee for many qualified plan purposes and welfare plan purposes. The leased employee rules do not affect the leasing organization at all. The focus is on the worker, and hence the organization for which the worker provides services is the “recipient” of those services.

By contrast, Rev. Proc. 2002-21 affects the PEO. It only indirectly affects worksite employees or Client Organizations. Because the focus of the Rev. Proc. is the PEO, the organization for which it is providing workers is the "Client Organization".

For more about the leased employee rules, see Chapter 4 of my book "Who's the Employer." For more about Rev. Proc. 2002-21, click here for a detailed analysis.

Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.