BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.
--An attorney subscriber
BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >
Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson
How Can I Aggregate Thee? Let Me Count the Ways.
(Posted April 30, 2004)
Question 262: Wife & Husband are both medical doctors. They have separate offices, separate businesses and separate profit-sharing plans, but they share 3 employees. These 3 employees would work over 1,000 hours if one combines the hours between the 2 offices, but they do not work over 1,000 hours at either office. Should they be covered by one of the profit-sharing plans?
Answer: In responding to your question, I will refer to my book, Who's the Employer?. (Subscribers can click to view online the text of references to sections in the book.)
Let's start with the shared employee issue. Shared employees work simultaneously for 2 or more separate businesses. (See WTE 5:01.) In the situation you describe, each employee works for only 1 business at a time and based on physical location, it is very easy to determine for whom he or she is working. Thus the shared employee rules do not apply. (Incidentally, there is no shared employee regulation. All we have are withdrawn proposed regulations and ancient Revenue Rulings.)
"Family aggregation" describes a confusing provision in the highly compensated employee rules that were repealed by the Small Business Job Protection Act in 1996. (See WTE 7:22.)
So that's 2 strikes. Are we out? No. We still need to determine whether the businesses are in a "controlled group." Assuming the doctors are happily married, there are several ways their 2 businesses could be in a controlled group, including:
1. They have a child under age 21. That child would be deemed to own both businesses because of attribution (as opposed to aggregation) from the doctors to the child.
2. Both businesses are community property. In that case, ownership of the businesses is identical and the businesses are in a controlled group without regard to attribution.
3. Either business is community property. In that case, one spouse woud have an actual interest in the other's business and then be deemed to own the balance of that business by attribution from the spouse.
4. One spouse is involved in the other's business as a director or employee, or is involved in management. If so, that spouse would be deemed to own the business. You should check this factor very carefully, because the employees work at both offices. (See WTE 7:21.)
If the businesses are in a controlled group, that all members of that group must count all hours with all group members. Under the facts you have outlined, that would give the employees more than 1,000 hours of service with each doctor.
Shared employees. Leased employees. Aggregation rules of all types. We'll be covering them all in SunGard Corbel's half day seminar on Who's the Employer. In the past, I've been able to give a couple of 2 hour presentations on Who's the Employer, but I've never before had a full 3-1/2 hours to play in my favorite sandbox! The extra time lets us bring in many case studies to let attendees see exactly how the rules work, and how to analyze situations that arise. My hope is that we will make the rules clear and understandable to help practitioners eliminate guesswork.
Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice
to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the
law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.
The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness
or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.)
that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.
Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson