Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Education Consultant

(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)


RPA logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

1099 for Bonus Only

(Posted May 4, 2004)

Question 263: My company currently has no retirement plan. Is it possible to have my performance-based bonus reported on a Form 1099 even though my normal salary is reported on Form W-2?

Answer: Is it possible? Yes. Would it be correct? Absolutely not. In responding to your question, I will refer to my book, Who's the Employer?. (Subscribers can click to view online the text of references to sections in the book.)

You either are an employee of the company or an independent contractor. Though it's theoretically possible to be simultaneously an employee and an independent contractor, it would be extremely rare and generally would involve doing 2 totally different jobs for the same employer. That's not the case here. The performance bonus is part of your compensation, presumably for services you performed as an employee. It is treated the same as all other compensation you receive for those services. (See WTE 2:36.)

The first sentence of your question concerns me. It implies that the reason you wish to be "1099-ed" for the bonus is so that you can set up a retirement plan to shelter part of it. That would work if you really were an independent contractor. But if you aren't (and you're probably not), then you aren't considered "an employer" for purposes of the retirement plan rules; hence any retirement arrangement you set up, other than an IRA, would not receive any special tax benefits. What counts is not how your employer reports a payment (although that enters into the consideration to a very small extent WTE 2:25); what counts is what the payment truly is, as a matter of law. Don't go down this route.

Incidentally, SunGard Corbel's upcoming slate of half day seminars on Who's the Employer will cover questions like yours, because it is impossible to understand leased employee issues or to put controlled group issues in proper context, unless one first understands the fundamentals of the common law employer-employee relationship. The key point to remember about that relationship is that employee status is determined by all the facts, not by what the parties call it.

Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.

Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2022, Inc.