Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions

Featured Jobs

DB Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company
(Telecommute / Winter Park FL)

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Retirement Plan Administrator (Account Manager)

Kushner & Company
(Telecommute / Portage MI)

Plan Document Specialist

Jocelyn Pension Consulting
(Telecommute / Boulder CO / San Rafael CA)

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

Retirement Plan Administrator

My Benefits, LLC
(Telecommute / Daphne AL / Atlantic Beach FL)

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Administrator

RSW & Associates
(CT / NJ / NY)

DC or DB Administrator

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Telecommute / Tacoma WA / Tualatin OR / Littleton CO)

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Audits of Multiple Employer Plans

(Posted May 31, 2005)

Question 277: I am interested in the audit aspect of a multiple employer plan. In my situation there are several small employer plans aggregated into a multiple employer plan. Individually none of the plans would meet the audit requirement; but as a multiple employer plan there are over 100 participants, so the plan files Schedule H to Form 5500. Small employers should weigh in the audit cost associated with the multiple employer plan in considering administrative costs.

Answer: Is there a question that goes with that answer?

You are correct that a multiple employer plan is a single 414(l) plan. As such, it files one 5500. When the plan answers question 6 (number of participants at the start of the year), that answer applies to the plan as a whole. That question and answer determines whether the plan is a large plan-- which must file Schedule H and have an audit-- or a small plan-- which can file Schedule I and generally avoid an audit.

A multiple employer plan always involves trade-offs. There is additional complexity and risk associated with a multiple employer design. Increased audit potential is part of that complexity. On the other hand there are savings from having a larger pool of money to invest, a single 5500 to file, and a single document to maintain. Each employer must weigh these factors as they apply to its particular situation.

Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.