Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Post and Distribute
Your Jobs
ARPA News
ARPA Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Director of 401(k) Implementation, Core

Human Interest
(Telecommute / Mill Valley CA)

Human Interest logo

Product Support Consultant

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory
(Telecommute)

ftwilliam.com part of Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory logo

DB/DC Administrator

Primark Benefits
(Telecommute / Burlingame CA)

Primark Benefits logo

401(k) Consultant

TPS Group
(Telecommute / North Haven CT)

TPS Group logo

DC or DB Administrator

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Telecommute / Tacoma WA / Tualatin OR / Littleton CO)

Farmer & Betts, Inc. logo

401(k) Implementation Manager

Human Interest
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA)

Human Interest logo

DB Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

The Nolan Company logo

Plan Document Specialist

Jocelyn Pension Consulting
(Telecommute / Boulder CO / San Rafael CA)

Jocelyn Pension Consulting logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

My Benefits, LLC
(Telecommute / Daphne AL / Atlantic Beach FL)

My Benefits, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator (Account Manager)

Kushner & Company
(Telecommute / Portage MI)

Kushner & Company logo

Director of Finance

NYCDC of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

Employee Benefits/Health and Welfare Attorney

Miller Johnson
(Telecommute / Grand Rapids MI / Kalamazoo MI / Detroit MI)

Miller Johnson logo

Retirement Plan Consultant / Relationship Manager

Associated Pension Consultants
(Chico CA / Sacramento CA)

Associated Pension Consultants logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

The Nolan Company
(Telecommute / Overland Park KS)

The Nolan Company logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

RSW & Associates
(CT / NJ / NY)

RSW & Associates logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company
(Telecommute / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company logo

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Parental Attribution Bypasses Spousal Exception

(Posted November 28, 2008)

Question 296: Does Code section 1563(e)(6)(a) prevent parents who own separate businesses and have a minor child from availing themselves of the exceptions to the constructive ownership rules?

Answer: Yes and no. Let me break up your question into the different questions it suggests.

1. Does a minor child prevent a husband and wife from using either of the exceptions to spousal attribution under the controlled group rules? No. The law treats me as owning my wife’s stock unless (a) we are divorced (final or interlocutory) or legally separated (heaven forbid!) or (b) the noninvolvement exception applies. Under the noninvolvement exception, I am not deemed to own my wife’s stock if I do not own any stock directly, I am not a director or employee and do not participate in management, not more than 50% of the corporation’s income comes from rents, royalties, annuities, dividends, etc., and the stock is not subject to transfer restrictions which run in my favor or in favor of my children under age 21. Having a minor child does not change either of these exceptions.

2. Does that mean that no other attribution rule applies? No. There are six different attribution rules, and the two spousal exceptions address only one of them: attribution between spouses. For example, if I have an option to buy my wife’s stock, then the law deems that I own the stock through option attribution, even if the noninvolvement exception otherwise would apply.

3. So, if I own my business and my wife owns her business, and the noninvolvement exception applies, does a controlled group exist if we have a child under age 21? Yes, because the controlled group rules treat our child under age 21 as owning my stock and my wife’s stock. The noninvolvement exception does not prevent parent-child attribution. It prevents husband-wife attribution.

4. But doesn’t this involve double family attribution, which the law prohibits? No. Our child is deemed to own my stock. Our child is deemed to own my wife’s stock. Each share of stock has been attributed once and only once. This is not attribution from me to our child to the child’s mother (my wife). This is attribution from me to our child and my wife to our child.

Could the law have been written differently? Of course it could have? Should it have been written differently? Perhaps. But the statute is the statute and the language of the statute is blindingly clear.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2021 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.