BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo

Subscribe


Search the News


Featured Jobs
Associate Attorney
Account Manager
Retirement Plan Administrator
Assistant Administrator
Consultant
Retirement Plan Analyst
Enrolled Actuary
ESOP Administrator
Search all jobs
 
Get the BenefitsLink app for iPhone and iPadLinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson

Who's the Employer: Partnership or Partner?

(Posted January 3, 2012)

Question 303: John is the one of three equal general partners of a general partnership (not an LLC). The general partnership does not have any employees. Could John set up a defined benefit plan for himself?

Answer: No, for several reasons.

The most fundamental of these is that John is not an employer, and therefore cannot establish a plan.

Let's assume that John's services are a material income-producing factor for the partnership. Why do I make that assumption? Because that is crucial to finding that John is an employee. If John isn't an employee, a qualified plan cannot cover him.

There are a great many general partners who don't serve in their partnerships. These partners have net earnings from self-employment ("NESE" or SE taxable income), but they don't have earned income. NESE is earned income only if the owner's services are a material income-producing factor of the business generating the income. [Code 401(c)(2).] If a sole proprietor or partner has earned income, then he or she is a self-employed individual ("SEI"). [Code 401(c)(1)(B).] An SEI is an employee for plan purposes. [Code 401(c)(1).]

That is all just a prelude to the real question here. Not to be cute, the question is "Who's the employer?" Is it John, or is it the partnership?

Code 401(c)(4) is quite clear that it's the partnership, and not John individually. If the partnership is the employer, then the partnership must establish the plan. John cannot establish the plan because the plan would cover someone who is not John's employee (John), and thus would violate the exclusive benefit rule.

Now let's look at the question you didn't ask. Can the partnership set up a defined benefit plan just covering John?

Because all the partners are HCEs, and there are no other employees, the partnership certainly could establish a defined contribution plan just for John, because the plan would automatically satisfy coverage. [Treas. Reg. 1.410(b)-2(b)(5).] But the partnership would be unable to set up a defined benefit plan just for John. Such a plan would violate the minimum participation rule of Code 401(a)(26), which requires, in this case, that the plan cover at least two employees. It doesn't matter whether the employees are HCEs or NHCEs. So the plan would need to cover both John and at least one of his partners.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:
 
Webmaster:
© 2017 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
Privacy Policy