Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Remote / WA)

Farmer & Betts, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Documents Specialist

Loren D. Stark Company
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company logo

DC Plan Administrator

Retirement, LLC
(Remote / Oklahoma City OK)

Retirement, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Kentucky Trust Company
(Danville KY)

Kentucky Trust Company logo

Retirement Plan Legal Specialist

Pentegra
(Remote / West Harrison NY)

Pentegra logo

Retirement Plan Specialist

RTD Financial Advisors
(Philadelphia PA)

RTD Financial Advisors logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Carpenter Morse Group
(Remote)

Carpenter Morse Group logo

Sales Consultant

EPIC Retirement Plan Services
(Remote / Norwich NY / KY / MA / ME / OH / PA / VT)

EPIC Retirement Plan Services logo

Quality Assurance Manager

Bates & Company
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company logo

Fund Administrator

Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Benefit Funds
(Long Island City NY)

Distribution \ Loan Clerk

Retirement, LLC
(Remote / Oklahoma City OK)

Retirement, LLC logo

Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Associate Attorney

Verrill
(Portland ME / Boston MA)

Verrill logo

Administrator/Consultant (DC and DB)

TPA Professionals
(Remote)

Compliance Analyst

Pentegra
(Remote / West Harrison NY)

Pentegra logo

Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Associate Attorney

Polsinelli PC
(Chicago IL / Dallas TX / Kansas City MO)

Polsinelli PC logo

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

Jr Retirement Plan Administrator/ Administrative Assistant

Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc.
(Melville NY)

Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator (TPA)

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Remote)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Executive Compensation Lawyer

Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
(Remote / San Francisco CA)

Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC: TPA/DPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC: TPA/DPS logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Corona CA / Rancho Cordova CA)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

PEO Sponsoring a Cafeteria Plan

(Posted January 25, 2000)

Question 43: This question is about PEO's sponsoring a multiple employer Section 125 (cafeteria) plan. The PEO in question has 6 client companies. The PEO has a Section 125 plan. It allows some of the client-employers to opt out of offering those leased employees the flexible spending account options under the Section 125 plan (only offering them the premium-only option). How can they do this, and still satisfy the "availability" requirement of Section 125 (the rule that all benefits must be reasonably available to all of the employees)? Can each co-employer pick and choose things like premium-only option, cap for medical reimbursements under flexible spending accounts, or eligibility?

Answer: As with all PEO issues, the first question is "Who's the Employer?"

If the PEO is not the common-law employer (and case after case has found that the PEO is not), then the plan violates IRC 125(d). That means every participant (not just the group of highly compensated employees) is taxed as though he or she were in constructive receipt of the monies put into the plan, whether or not the moneys are spent on otherwise nontaxable benefits. (This issue is discussed in more detail in Chapter 4 of my book, Who's the Employer?.)

Let's assume the PEO is the true employer. That means it is the common-law employer of each and every person in the plan. The PEO, then, is left administering the plan as though it were the true employer, not as though the client were the true employer with decisions over benefits.

If the PEO is the employer, then all testing for discrimination, reasonable availability, etc., is done at its level, not at the recipient (client) level.

Of course, assuming it could satisfy the discrimination rules, a PEO could set up separate plans for different groups of workers, with different benefits. Again, each such plan would have to satisfy the nondiscrimination rules, but that is certainly an option, just as a large corporation could set up separate plans for the shipping and sales divisions. Doing so does not violate the "reasonably available" rule, because that rule requires FSA benefits to be reasonably available to all participants, not to all employees.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.