Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Assistant Team Leader

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Austin TX / Dallas TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
Senior Actuarial Administrator

Group RHI
(TX / Telecommute)
Defined Benefits Combo Cash Balance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company
(Houston TX / Telecommute)
Retirement Plan Sales Territory Manager

Loren D. Stark Company
(Irving TX / Telecommute)
Client Relationship Manager

Loren D. Stark Company
(Houston TX / Telecommute)
Plan Document Support Specialist

Actuarial Systems Corporation
(Sylmar CA / Telecommute)
Plan Document ERISA Attorney

Actuarial Systems Corporation
(Sylmar CA / Telecommute)
DC Plan Administrator

San Diego Pension Consultants
(San Diego CA)
Compliance Analyst (QKA)

Newport Group
(Folsom CA / Dallas TX / Walnut Creek CA / Annapolis MD / Burlington VT / Charlotte NC / Chicago IL / Fresno CA / Moline IL / Lake Mary FL / Saint Petersburg FL / Saint Louis MO / AL / IA / MN / PA / VA / WI)
Apprentice - Financial Services and Employee Benefits

Columbia Benefits, LLC
(Englewood CO)
Retirement Plan Relationship Advisor

Prosperity Advisors, LLC and SS&G Wealth Management
(Akron OH)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

HCE Attribution Rules Between Parent and Child

(Posted December 21, 2000)

Question 69: An employee who owns 3% of the company is an officer. He earns more than $85,000 annually, so he is both a "highly compensated employee" (HCE) and a "key" employee for top-heavy testing purposes. Is his daughter considered an HCE or a key employee?

Answer: Not necessarily. For both key employee and highly compensated employee purposes, the daughter is deemed to own all of her father's stock. That means she is deemed to be a 3% owner (more if she owns some outright, of course).

But being a 3% owner isn't enough. If Dad owned 6%, she would automatically be a key employee, but a 3% owner doesn't do it. She would have to be an officer, be one of the "top 10" employees, or have compensation exceeding $150,000. And those things aren't attributed. Dad's being an officer doesn't make her an officer, for example. Dad's having high compensation doesn't mean she is treated as highly paid.

Similarly, to be a highly compensated employee under 414(q), she must be either a 5% owner (not true in your situation) or have compensation herself over the $85,000 threshhold, as adjusted.

In other words, all that the attribution rules attribute is the ownership of stock, partnership interests, etc. They do not attribute status as an employee or officer, nor do they cause attribution of compensation.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.