Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Display and Distribute
Your Job Openings
COVID-19 News
COVID-19 Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Defined Benefits Combo Cash Balance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Telecommute)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Manager, Defined Contributions Administration

Definiti
(Telecommute / The Woodlands TX / University Place WA / Dallas TX / Erie PA / Canonsburg PA / West Palm Beach FL)

Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

401k America
(Telecommute / Chino CA)

5500 Specialist

401K Generation
(Altamonte Springs FL)

401K Generation logo

Client Service Manager

July Business Services
(Telecommute / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates
(Telecommute / Encino CA)

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates logo

Trust Funds Accountant

RFK Medical Plan/JDLC Pension Plan
(Keene CA)

Director, Retirement Benefits

Wespath Benefits and Investments
(Telecommute / Glenview IL)

Wespath Benefits and Investments logo

Defined Contribution Administrator

PACETPA
(Telecommute / Clovis CA / Las Vegas NV)

PACETPA logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

HCE Attribution Rules Between Parent and Child

(Posted December 21, 2000)

Question 69: An employee who owns 3% of the company is an officer. He earns more than $85,000 annually, so he is both a "highly compensated employee" (HCE) and a "key" employee for top-heavy testing purposes. Is his daughter considered an HCE or a key employee?

Answer: Not necessarily. For both key employee and highly compensated employee purposes, the daughter is deemed to own all of her father's stock. That means she is deemed to be a 3% owner (more if she owns some outright, of course).

But being a 3% owner isn't enough. If Dad owned 6%, she would automatically be a key employee, but a 3% owner doesn't do it. She would have to be an officer, be one of the "top 10" employees, or have compensation exceeding $150,000. And those things aren't attributed. Dad's being an officer doesn't make her an officer, for example. Dad's having high compensation doesn't mean she is treated as highly paid.

Similarly, to be a highly compensated employee under 414(q), she must be either a 5% owner (not true in your situation) or have compensation herself over the $85,000 threshhold, as adjusted.

In other words, all that the attribution rules attribute is the ownership of stock, partnership interests, etc. They do not attribute status as an employee or officer, nor do they cause attribution of compensation.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.