BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.
--An attorney subscriber
BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >
Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson
Having Just a Single Customer Doesn't Mean Aggregation is Required
(Posted February 12, 2001)
Question 76: If 100% of a company's sales of a product are to one unrelated company, are there any issues as to who is the employer?
Answer: No. The controlled group rules are based strictly on ownership. Sales are immaterial. If the two companies have substantially similar ownership, you might have a controlled group, but not otherwise.
The affiliated service group rules are based on the performance of services of one nature or another, not the sale of products. Generally, the company in question would not be considered a service organization and so could not be a First Service Organization (FSO) or an A-Org. Unless it performs significant employee services, it cannot be a B-Org. Unless it performs management services (or its customer's principal business purpose is providing it with management services), it cannot be part of a management function group.
The related party rules, which can affect leased employee status, are based solely on ownership.
Any way you cut it, sales of products, in and of themselves, do not cause aggregation of employers for purposes of the tax-qualified plan requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice
to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the
law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.
The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness
or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.)
that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.
Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson