Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

DC Plan Administrator

Retirement, LLC
(Remote / Oklahoma City OK)

Retirement, LLC logo

Benefits Supervisor

NFL Player Benefit Office
(Baltimore MD)

NFL Player Benefit Office logo

Plan Consultant

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group
(Remote / Wakefield MA)

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group logo

Senior Actuarial Analyst/ Project Manager

Van Iwaarden Associates
(Remote / Minneapolis MN)

Van Iwaarden Associates logo

DC Administrator

United Benefit Pensions Inc.
(Remote / Melville NY)

United Benefit Pensions Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Hessel & Associates, LLC
(Remote / IL)

Hessel & Associates, LLC logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group
(Remote / Wakefield MA / Melville NY / Bingham Farms MI)

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group logo

Distribution \ Loan Clerk

Retirement, LLC
(Remote / Oklahoma City OK)

Retirement, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Rancho Cordova CA / Corona CA)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Manager - Defined Contribution Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Enhanced Retirement Solutions
(Rochester NY)

Enhanced Retirement Solutions logo

Sr. Retirement Plan Administrator

Tycor Benefit Administrators, Inc.
(Berwyn PA)

Tycor Benefit Administrators, Inc. logo

Senior Administrator / Site Manager

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / AZ / ID / NM / NV / UT)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Junior Implementation Specialist - 401(k) Administration

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(Remote / San Francisco CA)

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings logo

Senior Plan Consultant

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group
(Remote / Wakefield MA)

Sentinel Benefits & Financial Group logo

Defined Benefit Pension Consultant

The Ryding Company
(Remote / Westlake Village CA)

The Ryding Company logo

Compliance Analyst - 401(k) Administration

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(Remote / San Francisco CA)

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

BenefitsLink > Q&A Columns >

Who's the Employer?

Answers are provided by S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Triple Attribution In Controlled Group

(Posted April 2, 2001)

Question 92: Corporation X owns 100% of Corporation Y. Corporation X is owned in equal proportions by two partnerships, Partnership 1 and Partnership 2. Partnership 1 is owned by Mike (2%) and Mrs. Mike (98%). Partnership 2 is owned by Dave (2%) and Mrs. Dave (98%). Each partnership also owns 50% of Corporation Z. The question is, do Corporation Y and Corporation Z constitute a brother-sister controlled group?

Answer: Yes, they do.

Let's simplify the facts just a bit. Dave and Mrs. Dave are each deemed to own 100% of Partnership 2, because there clearly would be attribution between husband and wife in this situation. Ditto Mike and Mrs. Mike for Partnership 1. So, to make it simple, I'm going to ignore the men and focus focus on the economic powerhouses in this question, the wives. I don't have to, but it makes life easier. Note, however, that I could just as easily focus on the husbands.

Mrs. Dave is deemed to own 100% of everything Partnership 2 owns. That means she is deemed to own 50% of X and 50% of Z. As half owner of X, she is deemed to own half of everything X owns, giving her 50% of Y as well. Similarly, Mrs. Mike is deemed to own 50% of all three corporations.

So we now have two individuals who each are deemed to own 50% of each of three corporations. That's as clear a brother-sister controlled group as you could wish.

Notice that this problem involves multiple layers of attribution. I attribute husband's stock to their wives. I attributed the partnership assets to the partners. I attributed X's assets to its deemed shareholders. The Y stock went through all three layers of attribution. That is perfectly permissible under the attribution rules of Internal Revenue Code section 1563.

For more information about controlled group attribution, see Chapter 7 of my book, Who's the Employer?.


Important notice:

Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner or to readers. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of this and similar situations.

The law in this area changes frequently. Answers are believed to be correct as of the posting dates shown. The completeness or accuracy of a particular answer may be affected by changes in the law (statutes, regulations, rulings, court decisions, etc.) that occur after the date on which a particular Q&A is posted.


Copyright 1999-2017 S. Derrin Watson
Related links:

(restricted access)

(restricted access)

© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.