Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company, Inc.
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company, Inc. logo

Business Development Director

AimPoint Pension
(Remote / Pompano Beach FL / AL / GA)

AimPoint Pension logo

Loan & Distribution Specialist

AimPoint Pension
(Remote)

AimPoint Pension logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Supreme Court Sets Fee Standard for Mutual Fund Advisers
Mercer Link to more items from this source
Apr. 6, 2010
Excerpt: Addressing allegations that a mutual fund investment adviser breached its fiduciary duty under the Investment Company Act of 1940 by charging excessive fees, a unanimous US Supreme Court has ruled an adviser faces liability only if the fee 'is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm's length bargaining' (Jones v. Harris Assoc.). Though the case did not involve ERISA issues, the ruling could color analysis of claims that excessive 401(k) fees violate ERISA fiduciary standards.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.