Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

Regional Sales Director (West)

July Business Services
(CA)

July Business Services logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Manager

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Second Circuit Affirms that Health Plan's Same-Sex Spouse Exclusion Does Not Violate ERISA
Benefits Bryan Cave Link to more items from this source
Jan. 27, 2015

"On December 23, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the District Court's dismissal of plaintiffs' claims alleging that the same-sex spouse exclusion in the employer's self-insured medical plan violated Section 510 of [ERISA] and also dismissed plaintiffs' breach of fiduciary duty claim under Section 404 of ERISA.... Employers considering such an exclusion for their self-insured plans should note that the decision is expressly limited to consideration of the ERISA claims and both the District Court and Second Circuit declined to address whether the exclusion is constitutional or valid under any other federal or state law." [Roe v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, No. 14-1759-CV (2d Cir. Dec. 23, 2014; unpublished)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.