Greenline Wealth Management
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Ninth Circuit Declines to Apply California's Insurance Notice-Prejudice Rule to a Benefits Claim Against a Self-Funded ERISA Plan
Seyfarth Shaw LLP June 17, 2015 "The Court of Appeals determined that the Plan's one-year claim submission deadline was reasonable and did not conflict with ERISA. While recognizing a general federal judicial duty to formulate federal common law to supplement the provisions and purposes of ERISA, the Court of Appeals found that no such judicial legislation was required.... California's notice-prejudice rule is exclusively a creature of state insurance law. The Court of Appeals concluded that extending an insurance-based rule to uninsured plans, such as the Plan at issue, would defeat the distinction Congress made between insured and uninsured plans." [Zagon v. Am. Airlines, Inc. LTD Plan, No. 13-55866 (9th Cir. May 21, 2015) ] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |