Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement USA, LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA, LLC logo

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Syracuse NY)

BPAS logo

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

Employee Benefits Account Manager

U.S. Retirement & Benefits Partners
(Wayne PA / Hybrid)

U.S. Retirement & Benefits Partners logo

Retirement Plan Analyst - Defined Contribution Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Envoy Financial
(Colorado Springs CO / Hybrid)

Envoy Financial logo

Manager - Defined Contribution Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

Senior Retirement Plan Analyst - Defined Contribution Plans

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

M2B Retirement Consulting LLC logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Federal District Court Opinion Denying Retiree Lifetime Health Benefits Post-Tackett (PDF)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Link to more items from this source
Nov. 2, 2015
17 pages. "Upon reconsideration, in light of [M&G Polymers v. Tackett], and with due consideration to the general durational limits in the CBAs, ... the Court maintains the results of its bench trial decision with respect to Subclasses A, C, and D, but reverses its bench trial decision with respect to Subclass B.... In the shadow of Tackett, and given the lack of ambiguity on the face of the relevant Welfare Plans, the Court's bench trial ruling in favor of Plaintiffs becomes untenable. The Court therefore returns to its initial finding and grants summary judgment to Defendants with respect to Subclass B." [Zino v. Whirlpool, No. 5:11CV01676 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2015)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.