Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
(Remote)

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA) logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote)

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

Combo Plan Administrator

Pollard & Associates
(Remote)

Pollard & Associates logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

RP-Client Service Associate

Greenline Wealth Management
(FL / Hybrid)

Greenline Wealth Management logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

7 Matching News Items

1.  Family Responsibilities Discrimination: Does It Really Exist?
The Legal Intelligencer via Blank Rome LLP Link to more items from this source
Apr. 22, 2008
Excerpt: There has been an emerging focus on the legal issues related to the treatment of caregivers in the workplace with a significant increase of discrimination lawsuits on the basis of a person's caregiving responsibilities -- often referred to as Family Responsibilities Discrimination. But what is FRD? Does such a cause of action exist? This article serves to answer these questions.
2.  SEC Addresses Rulemaking Mandates on Compensation (PDF)
Ballard Spahr LLP via The Legal Intelligencer Link to more items from this source
Oct. 22, 2015
"During 2015, the SEC issued rules on three significant and highly anticipated compensation-related matters. The rules, two of which are proposed and one of which is final, address pay-for-performance disclosure, the clawback of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation, and, perhaps most significantly, pay-ratio disclosure.... Some of the underlying requirements of the rules have been met with fierce criticism. This article reviews the SEC's rules on these major compensation matters and summarizes their likely impact on public companies."
3.  ERISA Benefits Litigation Article Discusses Effect of Met Life v. Glenn
Health Plan Law
Sept. 10, 2009
Excerpt: Mark Stephenson, Nelson Levine de Luca & Horst, recent published an article entitled ' ERISA Benefits Litigation ? A Tilting Playing Field' in the Legal Intelligencer. The article notes the varied approaches taken in judicial review post-Glenn and the concommitant burdens placed upon ERISA plan sponsors and fiduciaries.
4.  3rd Circuit: Some ERISA Cases May Need More Scrutiny
The Legal Intelligencer via Law.com Link to more items from this source
Sept. 17, 2007
Excerpt: Insurers regularly use video surveillance in disability cases to ferret out bogus claims, but a federal appeals court has now ruled that when the surveillance is continued even after it has garnered no evidence of fraud, the insurer's ultimate decision to cut off benefits may be subject to 'heightened scrutiny.'
5.  3rd Circuit Court Says Stricter Standard Needed in Kosiba v. Merck & Co. ERISA Case
The Legal Intelligencer via Law.com Link to more items from this source
Sept. 14, 2004
Excerpt: In its June 2000 decision in Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that 'heightened scrutiny' is required when an insurance company both funds and administers an ERISA benefits plan since the combination of such fiduciary and non-fiduciary roles creates an inherent conflict of interest.
6.  3rd Circuit: ERISA Pre-Empts Anti-Subrogation Law -- N.J. Statute Doesn't Qualify for Savings Clause
The Legal Intelligencer via Law.com Link to more items from this source
Mar. 18, 2005
Excerpt: In a significant victory for insurers, a federal appeals court has ruled that New Jersey's anti-subrogation statute conflicts with ERISA, and that health care insurers are therefore entitled to seek reimbursement of medical expenses from insureds who later win or settle a personal injury suit against a third party.
7.  The State of Regulation of Executive Compensation: How Did We Get Here?
Ballard Spahr LLP, via Legal Intelligencer Link to more items from this source
Sept. 13, 2016
"There have been various attempts throughout the years to regulate the amounts of executive compensation paid to CEOs and other executives. These attempts were largely reactive to down economic periods that resulted with many rank and file individuals losing their jobs ... While most of the mandates of Dodd-Frank relate to regulation through disclosure of pay, the attempt to regulate pay itself has come to fruition this summer."

Your Search Options

  • If you have selected the Any Word radio button, above:

    Enter a single word, or as many words as you'd like (perhaps some synonyms). An item will match if it contains any one of the words.

    If you enter several words, the search engine will determine which words are the most important. So you can enter a question. Or you can paste an excerpt of several paragraphs from an article on another website to find similar news items on BenefitsLink.

  • If you have selected the All Words radio button, above:

    Enter several words. An item will match only if it contain every one of the words.

  • If you have selected the Advanced radio button, above:

    Certain words and punctuation take on special meanings—

    • Quotation marks can be used to require an exact phrase, such as
      "standard of review"
    • The words AND, OR and NOT become logic operators, which are especially powerful when used with parentheses, such as
      (vested OR vesting OR lifetime) AND (retiree OR retirement) AND (health OR healthcare) AND (benefits OR coverage)
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.